1976
DOI: 10.1258/002367776781071468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire alarms and oestrus in rats

Abstract: Vaginal smear cyclicity was used as a physiological test to compare the response of rats to the new "silent" fire alarm developed by the Laboratory Animals Centre with a conventional fire bell. The fire bell had a highly significant effect on the vaginal smear cyclicity whereas the rats exposed to the "silent" fire alarm showed no significant changes from the control animals in quiet conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reviews (Newton 1978;Rabat 2007;Turner et al 2005;Willott 2007) provide compelling evidence that excessive noise is detrimental to animals. Studies have found that exposure to noise can result in hearing loss in many species and, in rats, sleep disturbances (Rabat 2006), reduced fertility (Gamble 1976), activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (Henkin and Knigge 1963), and changes in cardiovascular structure and function Table 2 A general comparison of the sensory abilities of commonly used laboratory species. The range of sound sensitivity at about 50 db (the level of typical human conversation) is an estimate from the literature.…”
Section: Impacts Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reviews (Newton 1978;Rabat 2007;Turner et al 2005;Willott 2007) provide compelling evidence that excessive noise is detrimental to animals. Studies have found that exposure to noise can result in hearing loss in many species and, in rats, sleep disturbances (Rabat 2006), reduced fertility (Gamble 1976), activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (Henkin and Knigge 1963), and changes in cardiovascular structure and function Table 2 A general comparison of the sensory abilities of commonly used laboratory species. The range of sound sensitivity at about 50 db (the level of typical human conversation) is an estimate from the literature.…”
Section: Impacts Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clough and Fasham (1975) described a fire alarm audible to people but not to rats, and Gamble (1976) indicated this alarm was inaudible to mice. Sound in animal facilities is generated by a variety of sources, not the least of which are the animals themselves.…”
Section: Noisementioning
confidence: 99%