2021
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire disturbance promotes biodiversity of plants, lichens and birds in the Siberian subarctic tundra

Abstract: Fire is an important ecological and evolutionary force that has shaped the world's terrestrial ecosystems for millennia, strongly influencing biodiversity patterns in fire-prone landscapes (He et al., 2019); however, fire regimes are being altered by anthropogenic drivers, leading to modifications in ecosystem composition (Kelly et al., 2020). Arctic and subarctic ecosystems experience wildfire events less often than other biomes (Archibald et al., 2013;Viereck & Schandelmeier, 1980), but climate change is exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in Siberia are infrequent but indicate massive fires in the forest areas of mixed genesis, citing anthropogenic impacts (Moskovchenko et al., 2020). Fires can increase ecosystem productivity in tundra ecosystems, and may promote biodiversity (Heim et al., 2022) and active recruitment of shrub species (Myers‐Smith et al., 2011) that can partly offset the fire depletion of biomass. However, fires also lead to the loss of slowly growing, energy‐rich lichen—the preferred, if not dominant, winter nutritional element of reindeer (Turunen et al., 2009), highlighting specifically the vulnerability of winter reindeer pastures.…”
Section: Convergence Science Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in Siberia are infrequent but indicate massive fires in the forest areas of mixed genesis, citing anthropogenic impacts (Moskovchenko et al., 2020). Fires can increase ecosystem productivity in tundra ecosystems, and may promote biodiversity (Heim et al., 2022) and active recruitment of shrub species (Myers‐Smith et al., 2011) that can partly offset the fire depletion of biomass. However, fires also lead to the loss of slowly growing, energy‐rich lichen—the preferred, if not dominant, winter nutritional element of reindeer (Turunen et al., 2009), highlighting specifically the vulnerability of winter reindeer pastures.…”
Section: Convergence Science Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of fire on biodiversity are complex, and our current understanding is built from studies on one to a few taxa, usually across limited spatial extents (but see He et al, 2019; Heim et al, 2022). Many species in fire‐prone environments have traits that can promote population persistence, allowing some individuals to withstand or avoid fires, stimulate regeneration of a new cohort, and/or move away from the fire and then return (Thurman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in elements of the fire regime will also differentially affect species, either directly or indirectly through subsequent shifts in vegetation communities (e.g., Fontaine & Kennedy, 2012; Le Breton et al, 2022; Mason et al, 2021; Ooi et al, 2014). As such, species responses will vary subject to different fire regime elements, and multi‐taxon comparisons of post‐fire responses are necessary to understand overall effects on biodiversity (e.g., Heim et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario, human population density is often used as an important surrogate for anthropogenic disturbance. However, the relationship between anthropogenic disturbance and diversity may also be positive (Shuai et al, 2021 ), as disturbance can take many forms and some types of disturbance may even promote diversity (Heim et al, 2022 ; Tocco et al, 2020 ). For example, cultivation may promote habitat diversity by turning some forests into crop fields, and fields themselves also provide important food resources for many species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%