2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire-resistance property of reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated that code predictions on the fire resistance for the walls are either overestimated or underestimated and need further experimental verification. In terms of ultimate load, yield load, cracked load, stiffness and ductility, Go et al [4] concluded that reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete walls possessed better fire resistance and structural behavior than reinforced normal weight aggregate concrete walls under the same test conditions. Mueller and Kurama [5] compared the measured thermocouple data from walls with analytical predictions from a simulation software in order to predict the through-thickness thermal gradients with validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Results indicated that code predictions on the fire resistance for the walls are either overestimated or underestimated and need further experimental verification. In terms of ultimate load, yield load, cracked load, stiffness and ductility, Go et al [4] concluded that reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete walls possessed better fire resistance and structural behavior than reinforced normal weight aggregate concrete walls under the same test conditions. Mueller and Kurama [5] compared the measured thermocouple data from walls with analytical predictions from a simulation software in order to predict the through-thickness thermal gradients with validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fire-resistance tests of light-weight concrete walls [1] have shown that such walls have a superior performance, when compared to normal-weight concrete walls in terms of yield load, ultimate load, crack load, stiffness, ductility and inter-story drift. Moreover, centrally reinforced walls behave better in fire than doubly reinforced walls with the same amount of reinforcement, while walls with smaller thermal bowing due to smaller in-plane load perform better than the walls with larger thermal bowing due to larger in-plane load [2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the steel temperature reaches 550°C, yielding strength is reduced by nearly 60%, and when the temperature reaches 600°C, it is reduced by another 50%. According to the standard temperature rising curve provided by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 119 and ISO 834, if a fire lasts for 20 minutes, the temperature at the fire scene will increase to 800°C, and the yielding strength and tensile strength will in turn be reduced by 90% or more. In addition, when the temperature of steel reaches a certain level, the mechanical behavior of the steel is altered by different fire temperatures and different methods of cooling .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%