Novel Fire Retardant Polymers and Composite Materials 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100136-3.00005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire-retardant recyclable and biobased polymer composites

Abstract: In this chapter, flame retardancy of recyclable and bio-based polymer composites is reviewed. Synthesis routes to obtain thermosetting bio-based polymer matrices are discussed and environmentally friendly flame retardancy solutions are proposed. Fire retardancy of thermoplastic biomatrices and fully recyclable self-reinforced composites made thereof are summarized. New methods to characterize the flame retardant biocomposites and understand their thermal degradation and flame retardant mechanisms are presented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to combined formulations in unreinforced matrix (SPE matrix RDP 1.5% P + APP 1.5% P: 33 V/V% LOI, V-0; SPE matrix RDP 2% P APP 1% P: 34 V/V% LOI [ 18 ]), the self-extinguishing, V-0 UL-94 was not reached in carbon fibre composite specimens, most likely due to the so called candlewick effect [ 19 ] and intumescent-hindering effect [ 13 ] of the introduced reinforcing fibres. Further increase of P-content in order to overcome this issue is not reasonable as at higher ratios the plasticizing effect of RDP becomes significant and the aggregation of solid APP particles is more distinct, which together leads to lower crosslinking density and impairs the flame retardant and mechanical performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to combined formulations in unreinforced matrix (SPE matrix RDP 1.5% P + APP 1.5% P: 33 V/V% LOI, V-0; SPE matrix RDP 2% P APP 1% P: 34 V/V% LOI [ 18 ]), the self-extinguishing, V-0 UL-94 was not reached in carbon fibre composite specimens, most likely due to the so called candlewick effect [ 19 ] and intumescent-hindering effect [ 13 ] of the introduced reinforcing fibres. Further increase of P-content in order to overcome this issue is not reasonable as at higher ratios the plasticizing effect of RDP becomes significant and the aggregation of solid APP particles is more distinct, which together leads to lower crosslinking density and impairs the flame retardant and mechanical performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the main application of PHAs is in the biomedical sector, a future prospect for PHAs can be imagined due to two of its exceptional characteristics: full biodegradability and a synthesis ability from bacteria [4]. In this sense, improvement of flammability properties of PHAs seems to be a priority for some applications [12]. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) as the first member of PHAs family has been the candidate of many research programs [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge in improving their flame retardant (FR) properties is to simultaneously maintain their other important characteristics, such as glass transition temperature and mechanical properties, as flame retardants usually have a plasticizing effect [3,4]. Furthermore, the fire retardancy of polymers in the presence of carbon fibre reinforcement also raises a number of other concerns: the ignition of these composites is facilitated by the high thermal conductivity of the carbon fibres (this phenomenon is addressed as the candlewick effect) [5], and the applied flame retardants usually increase the viscosity of the polymer matrix, which is a key property during the production of composites by injection technologies such as resin transfer molding (RTM) commonly used in high-tech industries [6]. Furthermore, the reinforcement can filter out the solid phase flame retardants during the injection of the matrix, which may lead to non-uniform particle distribution [7,8], and consequently to uneven fire performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%