2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2340669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire-Sale Spillovers and Systemic Risk

Abstract: We construct a new systemic risk measure that quantifies vulnerability to firesale spillovers using detailed regulatory balance sheet data for U.S. commercial banks and repo market data for broker-dealers. Even for moderate shocks in normal times, fire-sale externalities can be substantial. For commercial banks, a 1 percent exogenous shock to assets in 2013-Q1 produces fire sale externalities equal to 21 percent of system capital. For broker-dealers, a 1 percent shock to assets in August 2013 generates spillov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
67
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Under sufficiently adverse conditions, self-fulfilling runs can occur. Duarte and Eisenbach (2013) quantify repo runs and find large systemic effects.…”
Section: Financial Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Under sufficiently adverse conditions, self-fulfilling runs can occur. Duarte and Eisenbach (2013) quantify repo runs and find large systemic effects.…”
Section: Financial Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Carletti (2010) as well as Duarte and Eisenbach (2013) are recent examples. Furthermore, Nier, Yang, Yorulmazer, and Alentorn (2008) relate bank interconnectedness to bankspecific balance sheet information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical front, there is a growing literature that analyzes how balance sheet channels such as interbank lending, loan syndication or asset commonality induce interconnectedness among banks and propagate distress (inter alia, research by Freixas, Parigi, and Rochet (2000), Iyer and Peydró (2005), Gai, Haldane, andKapadia (2011), Greenwood, Landier, andThesmar (2012), Caballero and Simsek (2013), Duarte and Eisenbach (2013), Hale, Kapan, and Minoiu (2013) and Suhua, Yunhong, and Gaiyan (2013)). On the empirical side, there is a large literature which focuses on measuring credit risk interconnectedness from market data (Kritzman, Yuanzhen, Page, andRigobon (2011), Zhang et al (2012), Barigozzi and Brownlees (2013), Podlich and Wedow (2014) and Betz et al 1 (2014)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%