2018
DOI: 10.1002/fam.2685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire spread from an open‐doors electrical cabinet to neighboring targets in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility

Abstract: Summary Electrical cabinet fire is one of the main fire hazards in nuclear power plants. As part of the OECD PRISME‐2 programme, four fire tests were carried out to investigate the fire spread from an open‐doors electrical cabinet to overhead cable trays and adjacent cabinets in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility. These tests, named CFS‐5 to CFS‐7 and CORE‐6, used same both cabinet (fire source) and three overhead cable trays. The trays were filled with a halogenated flame‐retardant cable‐type for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each fire test, HRR evaluations were thus carried out from the previous thermal and CDG calorimetry methods, and they are shown in Figure . Considering that the thermal method can underestimate the HRR by about 15% because of heat sinks not considered in the thermal method and that the CDG method can generally overestimate the HRR, as already highlighted in Zavaleta and Audouin and Zavaleta et al, the two evaluations above can be considered to be rather consistent. These considerations also lead to assess the final HRR ( trueQ̇) as the average of the two previous HRR assessments: trueQ̇=Q̇thermal+Q̇CDG2. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For each fire test, HRR evaluations were thus carried out from the previous thermal and CDG calorimetry methods, and they are shown in Figure . Considering that the thermal method can underestimate the HRR by about 15% because of heat sinks not considered in the thermal method and that the CDG method can generally overestimate the HRR, as already highlighted in Zavaleta and Audouin and Zavaleta et al, the two evaluations above can be considered to be rather consistent. These considerations also lead to assess the final HRR ( trueQ̇) as the average of the two previous HRR assessments: trueQ̇=Q̇thermal+Q̇CDG2. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…According to their analysis, the CDG method was more appropriate. Only the CDG method was therefore applied for CORE‐5 test to evaluate the HRR as it was done in Zavaleta and Audouin …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [5]. The influence of other factors on fire characteristics and the spread of flame on the surface of electrical cables were investigated in scientific work of Zavaleta et al [6] and Sarazin et al [7]. Considerably less attention has been dedicated to researching the influence of an electrical cable slope (relative to the horizontal plane) on the flame out time and the spread of flame over the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%