Neural circuit functions are stabilized by homeostatic processes at long timescales in response to changes in behavioral states, experience, and learning. However, it remains unclear which specific physiological variables are being stabilized and which cellular or neural network components compose the homeostatic machinery. At this point, most evidence suggests that the distribution of firing rates among neurons in a neuronal circuit is the key variable that is maintained around a set-point value in a process called 'firing rate homeostasis.' Here, we review recent findings that implicate mitochondria as central players in mediating firing rate homeostasis. While mitochondria are known to regulate neuronal variables such as synaptic vesicle release or intracellular calcium concentration, the mitochondrial signaling pathways that are essential for firing rate homeostasis remain largely unknown. We used basic concepts of control theory to build a framework for classifying possible components of the homeostatic machinery that stabilizes firing rate, and we particularly emphasize the potential role of sleep and wakefulness in this homeostatic process. This framework may facilitate the identification of new homeostatic pathways whose malfunctions drive instability of neural circuits in distinct brain disorders.
The concept of neuronal homeostasisThe concept of homeostasis, based on the classical works of Claude Bernard, Walter Cannon, and James Hardy, refers to the mechanisms that maintain physiological variables within a dynamic range around a 'set point' [1][2][3]. In the context of neural circuits, homeostatic negative feedbacks enable stable activity of neural networks over long timescales, despite the highly dynamic and heterogeneous nature of individual synapses and neurons. Without such homeostatic feedback, the circuit's function may be destabilized by Hebbian-like synaptic plasticity underlying the cellular basis of learning and memory [4,5]. This plasticity-stability problem has been introduced and elegantly reviewed in earlier insightful papers [6][7][8], but many key questions remain unanswered.In particular, what are the components of the core homeostatic machinery at the subcellular and neural network levels, and what variable(s) do they regulate to prevent aberrant long-term changes in neural network activity?The function of many cellular variables such as synaptic weights, ion channels, neurotransmitter release, and receptor expression are dynamic under normal conditions, and scientists are challenged to dissect which of these dynamics are homeostatic in nature. Application of engineering control theory [7] can be used to navigate this issue, based on the following principal characteristics: (i) a set point that the system must return to following a perturbation, which defines the output of the homeostatic machinery; (ii) sensors that detect deviation from that set point; and (iii) homeostatic effectors that precisely retarget some regulated variable to that set point via negative feedback (Figure 1A)....