2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm entry, markups and the monetary transmission mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
85
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(43 reference statements)
9
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The point estimate of µ p is close to the value of 1.22 reported in Lewis and Stevens (2015). However, it is significantly smaller than the value of 1.66 reported in Lewis and Poilly (2012). Regarding the competition and the variety effect, the point estimate of µ p implies that a one percent increase in the mass of firms lowers the price mark-up by 0.21 percent (the competition effect ξ) and raises the relative price by 0.13 percent (the variety effect ω).…”
Section: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The point estimate of µ p is close to the value of 1.22 reported in Lewis and Stevens (2015). However, it is significantly smaller than the value of 1.66 reported in Lewis and Poilly (2012). Regarding the competition and the variety effect, the point estimate of µ p implies that a one percent increase in the mass of firms lowers the price mark-up by 0.21 percent (the competition effect ξ) and raises the relative price by 0.13 percent (the variety effect ω).…”
Section: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Lewis and Poilly (2012) study the role of firm entry for the monetary transmission mechanism by minimizing the distance between the impulse responses to a monetary policy shock generated by a sticky price entry model and those obtained from a VAR. Lewis and Stevens (2015) estimate -as we do -a business cycle with firm entry using Bayesian methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This strengthens competition and, via strategic interactions, reduces price markups. An early references on the procyclicality of the number of …rms'in the U.S. is Chatterjee and Cooper (1993), while a more recent one is Lewis and Poilly (2012). The countercyclicality of the price markup is consistent with the empirical …ndings by Bils (1987), Rotemberg and Woodford (2000) and Galì et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This point is less important when I introduce staggered pricing and perform a quantitative analysis. 6 The relationship between monetary policy and firm creation is discussed in Bilbiie et al (2007), Bergin and Corsetti (2008), Lewis (2009), and Lewis and Poilly (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%