2000
DOI: 10.1177/0092070300284003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm-Level Export Performance Assessment: Review, Evaluation, and Development

Abstract: Export performance is one of the most widely researched but least understood and most contentious areas of international marketing. To some extent, this problem can be ascribed to difficulties in conceptualizing, operationalizing, and measuring the export performance construct, often leading to inconsistent and conflicting results. This study reviews and evaluates more than 100 articles of pertinent empirical studies to assess and critique export performance measurements. Based on gaps identified in this evalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
725
2
69

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 677 publications
(809 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
13
725
2
69
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches for measuring EP are fragmented and uncoordinated (Kahiya and Dean 2014;Katsikea et al 2000) and no single view prevails (Sousa 2004). An almost philosophical approach points out that for most export start-ups pure survival is already some measurement of success (Kahiya and Dean 2014).…”
Section: Measuring Epmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approaches for measuring EP are fragmented and uncoordinated (Kahiya and Dean 2014;Katsikea et al 2000) and no single view prevails (Sousa 2004). An almost philosophical approach points out that for most export start-ups pure survival is already some measurement of success (Kahiya and Dean 2014).…”
Section: Measuring Epmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, there is a general agreement that a multidimensional approach including a range of determinants such as managerial, organizational, and environmental aspects is most appropriate (Baldauf et al 2000;Katsikea et al 2000;Rambocas et al 2015). This is confirmed by Morgan et al (2004) who synthesized the different views into a robust theoretical model.…”
Section: Determinants Of Epmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Portanto, é possível que diferenças nos resultados reflitam essas escolhas. Trata-se de um problema já apontado por autores de revisões sobre outros temas da área de negócios internacionais (Katsikeas, Leonidou, & Morgan, 2000;Sousa, 2004).…”
Section: Conclusõesunclassified
“…Although there does not seem to be a standard all-purpose framework for measuring export performance, a generic analytical framework for the characterization of the export performance phenomenon was presented here. Building upon previous models (especially Matthyssens &Pauwels, 1996, andKatsikeas et al, 2000), the newly proposed framework is argued to have improved them in two aspects: better labeling and organization of the model categories (though one can argue this is just a matter of personal taste) and explicit consideration of an additional methodological issue -structure of the indicators -which has not received proper attention in empirical literature. The proposed classification scheme is expected to serve as a general guideline for researchers to make explicit their research designs and to draw a parsimonious set of performance dimensions and indicators that better fit their specific purposes.…”
Section: Additional Remarks Conclusion and Suggestions For Future Rmentioning
confidence: 99%