Firm Size and Credit in Argentina

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Inter-American Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent. Terms of use: Documents inThe unauthorized commercial use of Bank documents is prohibited and may be punishable under the Bank's policies and/or applicable laws. Copyright ©Inter-American Development Bank. This working paper may be reproduced for any non-commercial purpose. It may also be reproduced in any academic journal indexed by the American Economic Association's EconLit, with previous consent by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), provided that the IDB is credited and that the author(s) receive no income from the publication. Cataloging-in-Publication AbstractThe goal of this paper is to study the link between bank credit (and internal funding) and average firm size in Argentina. Besides the fact that economic growth tends to go hand in hand with larger firm size, the topic is of particular interest because of the severe credit crunch in Argentina in the aftermath of the 2001-2002 financial crisis. To this end, a novel three-digit industry-level dataset spanning the 2000-2010 period was constructed. The results confirm the expected positive impact of credit supply on average firm size. Furthermore, the study expands on common knowledge by testing the sensitivity of firm size to internal funding and the differential financing behavior of the primary and the manufacturing sector. The results do not seem to be driven by endogeneity bias.JEL classifications: D22, D23, G21, G32

The Rental Market in Argentina: An Assessment Study

“…As a result, 79 percent did not use any loans at all, and over 90 percent of households for homes with their own savings. These results represent findings from current households asked about how they financed their homes regardless of when they bought them (Auguste, Bebczuk and Moya, 2011).…”

“…However, the third period, which began after the 2001-2002 crisis, boosted the demand for houses as safe havens, pushing their prices up relative building costs. Remarkably, this process occurs even when the mortgage loan market is practically nonexistent (see Auguste, Bebczuk and Moya, 2011).…”

“…For a country where more than three million households do not own a house, this figure looks quite insignificant. Also, Auguste, Bebczuk and Moya (2011) found that almost 80 percent of homeowners purchased their houses with their own savings.…”

Does Firm Heterogeneity Impact the Effectiveness of Carbon Taxes? Experiments in Argentina and Mexico

“…The probability of being detected and subject to taxation is greater the higher their scale of operation, so they must choose between gaining access to capital markets or stay as they are and pay lower taxes (see Tybout, 2000). Using evidence for Argentina, Auguste, Bebczuk and Sánchez (2013) confirm the hypotheses of limited access to capital markets and the higher cost of capital due to imperfections such as asymmetries of information.…”

Does Firm Heterogeneity Impact the Effectiveness of Carbon Taxes? Experiments in Argentina and Mexico

“…The probability of being detected and subject to taxation is greater the higher their scale of operation, so they must choose between gaining access to capital markets or stay as they are and pay lower taxes (see Tybout, 2000). Using evidence for Argentina, Auguste, Bebczuk and Sánchez (2013) confirm the hypotheses of limited access to capital markets and the higher cost of capital due to imperfections such as asymmetries of information.…”