Firm size and the political cycle premium

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use firm-level data to examine whether the political cycle differentially relates to small vs large firms in New Zealand; a country that operates a unicameral political system has a short three-year political term and a right-of-centre stock market premium exists. Design/methodology/approach – Using firm-level data from 1972 to 2010, the authors examine monthly returns during right-of-centre National governments and left-of-centre Labour governments. The authors apply Santa Clara and Valkanov (2003) regression analysis approach to examine the political cycle impact on firm returns. Findings – Like in the USA, New Zealand’s political cycle premium is driven by small firms; however, the results are opposite. In New Zealand, periods governed by the right of the political spectrum produce significantly higher stock returns than those from the left and this finding is primarily driven by small firms who perform particularly poorly under left-of-centre governments. Research limitations/implications – Small firms were relatively heavily affected by the move to an open, deregulated economy; they were also less able to cope with tight monetary conditions, and periods of sharply falling inflation. New Zealand’s three-year political term may encourage newly formed governments to implement relatively fast moving shifts in policy where a more reasoned and steady approach would be warranted. Originality/value – This is the first paper to use firm-level data outside of the USA to examine the political cycle impact.

The effect of political risk on emerging and developed markets

“…Their finding suggests that returns are lower under the Labour party compared to under National. The discussion on this issue was further analysed by Malone, Anderson & Peng (2015). They examined how political orientation relates to stock market returns, especially small and large firms by using the firm level data for the period 1972-2010.…”