2018
DOI: 10.33203/mfy.423917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firmalar arası Ticari Alacak Kredisini Açıklayan Teoriler: Borsa İstanbul’da bir Uygulama

Abstract: Interfirm trade credit that is a lending instrument between firms offers various benefits to the seller and buyer and the literature has presented a number of theories explaining trade credit based on these benefits. It was realized that the validity of these theories for the Turkish real sector has not been examined sufficiently and therefore in this study, it is aimed to give information about the trade credit theories and to test three of these theories on a sample of publicly held companies in the same sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Özlü and Yalçın (2012) directly investigated the TCC at the manufacturing firm level with gross trade credit terms using static panel data between 1996 and 2008. Without directly dealing with TCC, two papers (Demirgunes, 2016;Şahin, 2018) examined the trade credit determinants and theories on the data sets from Borsa Istanbul. The purpose of this paper is to examine TCC in Turkish real sector in terms of both GTC and NTC terms using dynamic panel data method on sectoral level samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Özlü and Yalçın (2012) directly investigated the TCC at the manufacturing firm level with gross trade credit terms using static panel data between 1996 and 2008. Without directly dealing with TCC, two papers (Demirgunes, 2016;Şahin, 2018) examined the trade credit determinants and theories on the data sets from Borsa Istanbul. The purpose of this paper is to examine TCC in Turkish real sector in terms of both GTC and NTC terms using dynamic panel data method on sectoral level samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%