2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First analysis of SWOG S0221: A phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk early breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, SWOG S0221 conducted a 2×2 design phase III trial comparing AC+G (filgrastim) versus dd AC in different combinations with either dd T (paclitaxel) for 6 cycles or weekly T for a total of 12 weeks. This trial showed equivalent progression free survival (PFS) in both weekly and 2 weekly T (82% in weekly versus 81% in dd PFS), suggesting that weekly paclitaxel could have the same efficacy without the patients having to receive the growth factor support 27 . A Spanish group published the results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study, comparing FAC, and FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel for node negative high-risk patients.…”
Section: Adjuvant Treatment In Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…More recently, SWOG S0221 conducted a 2×2 design phase III trial comparing AC+G (filgrastim) versus dd AC in different combinations with either dd T (paclitaxel) for 6 cycles or weekly T for a total of 12 weeks. This trial showed equivalent progression free survival (PFS) in both weekly and 2 weekly T (82% in weekly versus 81% in dd PFS), suggesting that weekly paclitaxel could have the same efficacy without the patients having to receive the growth factor support 27 . A Spanish group published the results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study, comparing FAC, and FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel for node negative high-risk patients.…”
Section: Adjuvant Treatment In Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the present evidence review, trials of taxanes represented the largest number of rcts (fifty-five trials in ninety-three publications) and are summarized in Supplemental Table 3 21,27-30,35,36, [49][50][51][52][53][54] . Because taxane studies are relatively recent, our database search found most of the published trials cited in other reviews or meta-analyses.…”
Section: Taxanesmentioning
confidence: 99%