2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First assessments of the taphonomic behaviour of jaguar (Panthera onca)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, it is important to point out that highly sophisticated techniques are not the all-encompassing solution that many analysts are looking for. When considering how carnivores can usually be described by the type 2 , 3 , 30 , ratio 27 , 34 , 36 , 50 and size of bite damage 51 53 , alongside the location 54 56 and extent of damage 57 , it can be seen how modelling carnivore behaviour should also take into account a wide range of different factors beyond BSMs. While neither one of these techniques can exclusively answer these questions, when combined, taphonomists currently have a very powerful toolkit at their disposal for discerning precise carnivore intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, it is important to point out that highly sophisticated techniques are not the all-encompassing solution that many analysts are looking for. When considering how carnivores can usually be described by the type 2 , 3 , 30 , ratio 27 , 34 , 36 , 50 and size of bite damage 51 53 , alongside the location 54 56 and extent of damage 57 , it can be seen how modelling carnivore behaviour should also take into account a wide range of different factors beyond BSMs. While neither one of these techniques can exclusively answer these questions, when combined, taphonomists currently have a very powerful toolkit at their disposal for discerning precise carnivore intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was presented without any possibility of comparing if lions and tigers modified carcasses differently. This is important, since not all felids exhibit the same behavior during feeding: jaguars are more similar to hyenas than to lions in the way that they modify carcasses 10 , 36 . Tigers are bigger than lions and, therefore, they could inflict more damage on the same carcasses that lions usually feed on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taphonomical signatures of different carnivores can be quite distinct, thereby enabling analytical discrimination when assessing the formation and alteration of bone assemblages. Felids generally leave fewer tooth-marks and inflict fewer fractures on limb bones 47 – 49 , although modern jaguars ( Panthera onca ) have shown some bone-deletion potential in captivity 50 . In contrast, hyenas can consume or chew almost any bony tissue, including antlers 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%