2014
DOI: 10.1115/1.4026062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Body Versus Third-Body: Dialogue Between an Experiment and a Combined Discrete and Finite Element Approach

Abstract: The present paper proposes to analyze relations between the behavior of two bodies in contact (local stress and vibration modes) and the rheology of third-body particles. Experiments are performed on a system composed of a polycarbonate disk in contact with a steel cylinder, where birefringent property of polycarbonate allows us to observe shear-stress isovalues. Multiscale numerical simulations involve the coupling between fi-nite elements and discrete elements to model simultaneously nonhomogeneous third-bod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this aim, accelerometers have been placed on the free surface of the polycarbonate disc to measure the system vibration during sliding and compare the acceleration signals with the numerical ones. The polycarbonate material has been chosen for its photoelastic properties and transparency for the observation of shear stress distribution and third body analysis, reported in [26,32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, accelerometers have been placed on the free surface of the polycarbonate disc to measure the system vibration during sliding and compare the acceleration signals with the numerical ones. The polycarbonate material has been chosen for its photoelastic properties and transparency for the observation of shear stress distribution and third body analysis, reported in [26,32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors tried to combine discrete elements with finite elements to combine the advantages of both methods [30][31][32]. In particular, the particles of a discrete model are a priori rigid, which is not the case when combining these two methods.…”
Section: Numerical Tribologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Pin-On-Disc to bearing a big gap exists due to the differences in the emulated kinematics. The literature [31][32][33] shows that the degrees of freedom of the system applying the contact conditions have a big impact on the creation and the distribution of the 3rd body inside the contact, which may lead to the opposite results if the tests are conducted on different tribometers, even if similar contact conditions are applied. The 3rd body is essentially composed of the particles detached from the materials initially in contact (called 1st bodies) and circulating inside the contact [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%