2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-015-9517-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Characterization of the Behavioral Repertory in a Ricinuleid: Cryptocellus narino Platnick & Paz 1979 (Arachnida, Ricinulei, Ricinoididae)

Abstract: Ricinuleids are considered one of the most enigmatic and neglected arachnid orders. The low diversity and poor local abundance of several species, makes the study of most aspects related to biology and behavior of this group very difficult. Most of the current knowledge related to ricinuleid biology relies on anecdotal observations. So far, no published studies exist that describe in detail ricinuleid behavior. Here we present the behavioral repertory of a ricinuleid, the Neotropical species Cryptocellus narin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some specimens in Burmese amber show aggregations of juveniles (Fig. 9D), a phenomenon which has only recently been described for extant ricinuleids (Garcia et al 2015).…”
Section: Order Opiliones Sundevall 1833mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Some specimens in Burmese amber show aggregations of juveniles (Fig. 9D), a phenomenon which has only recently been described for extant ricinuleids (Garcia et al 2015).…”
Section: Order Opiliones Sundevall 1833mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…;1996: 195, fig. 11 (misidentification); Harvey, 2003: 183 (part); García et al, 2015: 455. Ricinoides afzeli: Savory, 1964 101.…”
Section: Ricinoides Afzeliimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ricinulei (hooded tick spiders or tick beetles) have long been one of the least understood arachnid orders, but anatomical studies (Salvatierra & Tourinho, 2016; Salvatierra et al, 2013; Talarico et al, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011; Talarico, García Hernández, et al, 2008; Talarico, Palacios‐Vargas, et al, 2008), phylogenetic/biogeographic work (Fernández & Giribet, 2015; Murienne et al, 2013), a plethora of taxonomic descriptions (de Armas, 2017; Botero‐Trujillo, 2014; Botero‐Trujillo et al, 2021; Botero‐Trujillo & Valdez‐Mondragón, 2016; Pinto‐da‐Rocha & Andrade, 2012; Tourinho et al, 2010, 2014; Tourinho & Saturnino, 2010; Valdez‐Mondragón et al, 2018, 2020; Valdez‐Mondragón & Francke, 2011, 2013; Valdez‐Mondragón & Juárez‐Sánchez, 2021), and even behavioral observations (García et al, 2015) have put the group back on the map. For example, when the last catalogue of Ricinulei was published (Harvey, 2003), 55 species had been described, while 81 were reported in the World Ricinulei Catalog (WRC) of 2021 (although the WRC does not include an extra 15 species reported in the most recent taxonomic account of Botero‐Trujillo et al (2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%