2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/23/3/034020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First commercial medium voltage superconducting fault-current limiters: production, test and installation

Abstract: In 2008/09 Nexans SuperConductors GmbH made the step from R&D activities to the production of the first non-publicly funded fault-current limiter units. In close cooperation with two customers, Applied Superconductor Limited (ASL, UK) and Vattenfall (Germany), Nexans was able to design, produce and deliver two resistive superconducting limiter devices. Both devices are designed for the medium voltage grid and were tested at the high voltage and high power lab IPH in Berlin. The superconducting components of bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first time in HTS systems for electrical grids several projects have been realized without any public funding since 2009 (Fig. 10) [39]. This underlines the great interest of the utilities in this technology.…”
Section: Electrical Grid Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time in HTS systems for electrical grids several projects have been realized without any public funding since 2009 (Fig. 10) [39]. This underlines the great interest of the utilities in this technology.…”
Section: Electrical Grid Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the first field test of a SFCL for medium-voltagelevel applications named CURL10 was built with melt cast processed Bi2212 tubes cut into bifilar coils, showing virtually no degradation of the material after two years test [7]. Using the same bulk material, but cut into monofilar coils, the first commercial medium voltage SFCLs were released in 2009 by Nexans SuperConductors GmbH for two customers [8]: Applied Superconductor Limited in UK, and Vattenfall in Germany. Most recently, a SFCL with a rated power of 4.4 MVA (11 kV,0.4 kA) was installed in the UK earlier 2012, and it has been operating since middle 2013 [9].…”
Section: Practical Implementation Of Sfcl: Field Test Status and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to transformer inrush and protection, each generator is capable of supplying approximately 40kA (peak) for faults with negligible resistance; an overcurrent protection scheme can therefore readily differentiate between fault current and transformer inrush, even if only a single 2.1MW generator is in operation. with transformer inrush for the vessel studied in this paper, I c must always be selected with careful reference to transformer inrush currents [22]. For larger transformers, inrush could be significant and might impinge on fault current levels (and therefore on SFCL operation thresholds), particularly in situations where prospective faults levels are reduced due to all generation not being in service.…”
Section: Non-fault Transients and Their Potential To Cause Sfcl Mal-omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because it will affect the length of the recovery time of a resistive SFCL [15]. Note that energy dissipation may be substantially lower if an impedance is placed in parallel with the SFCL [5] and external to the cryogenic environment, but this will also affect the current limitation properties [22]. It has been shown how, for location A, a relatively large SFCL resistance can reduce both the severity of electrical disturbances and the amount of energy dissipated in the SFCL during faults.…”
Section: Non-fault Transients and Their Potential To Cause Sfcl Mal-omentioning
confidence: 99%