2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First description of seasonality of birth and diagnosis amongst teenagers and young adults with cancer aged 15–24 years in England, 1996–2005

Abstract: BackgroundWe aimed to examine evidence for an infectious aetiology among teenagers and young adults (TYA) by analysing monthly seasonality of diagnosis and birth amongst 15–24 year olds diagnosed with cancer in England.MethodsCases of leukaemia, lymphoma and central nervous system (CNS) tumours were derived from the national TYA cancer register (1996–2005). Incidence rates (IR) and trends were assessed using Poisson regression. Seasonality of diagnosis and birth was assessed using Poisson and logistic regressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Population mixing and deprivation did not appear to affect incidence of leukaemia in TYAs, contrasting to evidence of a significant association between both covariates and the incidence of leukaemia in children [6, 11]. Similarly, in our previous work focusing on seasonality of birth and diagnosis, our results of TYAs with leukaemia contrasted to those for children with leukaemia [25]. These differences are likely to occur due to differences in the disease epidemiology of leukaemia between these two age groups, whereby ALL dominates childhood leukaemia in contrast to AML more commonly seen in TYAs and the ratio of T-cell to B-cell ALL is higher amongst TYAs compared to children [33–35]; thus suggesting that the aetiology of leukaemia amongst TYAs is very different to that of leukaemia amongst children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Population mixing and deprivation did not appear to affect incidence of leukaemia in TYAs, contrasting to evidence of a significant association between both covariates and the incidence of leukaemia in children [6, 11]. Similarly, in our previous work focusing on seasonality of birth and diagnosis, our results of TYAs with leukaemia contrasted to those for children with leukaemia [25]. These differences are likely to occur due to differences in the disease epidemiology of leukaemia between these two age groups, whereby ALL dominates childhood leukaemia in contrast to AML more commonly seen in TYAs and the ratio of T-cell to B-cell ALL is higher amongst TYAs compared to children [33–35]; thus suggesting that the aetiology of leukaemia amongst TYAs is very different to that of leukaemia amongst children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…We have previously shown evidence of seasonality around the time of diagnosis for Hodgkin’s lymphoma and ‘other’ CNS tumours (subgroup 3.5 - [24]) as well as seasonality around the time of birth for those with glioma (except astrocytoma and ependymoma) [25]. In this study we investigated whether there was any evidence of an association between population mixing and these tumours occurring in 15–24 year olds using the same national dataset in England and an ecological study design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A UK study of 128 children with AML (ages <15 years) reported a sinusoidal pattern by season of birth for males only ( P =0.04), with peak risk among those with birthdates in September (11). Another UK study of 463 adolescents and young adults with AML (ages 15–24 years) found no association between season of birth and AML ( P =0.50) (25). A Swedish case-control study of 74 children with AML and an equal number of matched controls found no association between maternal infection and AML, but statistical power was low and season of birth was not examined (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that have examined this hypothesis have reported discrepant results, but have varied widely in design, analytic methods, age ranges and populations. [14][15][16] No studies have been conducted using a population-based cohort design with the ability to estimate relative risks of HL or NHL by season of birth. We conducted the first national cohort study to examine whether season of birth is associated with the risk of HL or NHL in childhood through young adulthood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%