2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-014-0129-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First description of the complete human xylosyltransferase-I promoter region

Abstract: BackgroundHuman xylosyltransferase-I (XT-I) catalyzes the rate-limiting step in proteoglycan glycosylation. An increase in XYLT1 mRNA expression and serum XT activity is associated with diseases characterized by abnormal extracellular matrix accumulation like, for instance, fibrosis. Nevertheless, physiological and pathological mechanisms of transcriptional XT regulation remain elusive.ResultsTo elucidate whether promoter variations might affect the naturally occurring variability in serum XT activity, a compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the promoter region of XYLT1, the XYLT2 promoter does not exhibit a binding site for the AP1 transcription factor, which plays a considerable role in the regulation of XYLT1 gene by JNK and p38 [43], explaining why basal XYLT2 expression was not influenced by the usage of p38 and JNK inhibitors in this study. While the XYLT1 promoter exhibits numerous transcription-binding sites for EGR1, which was previously shown to response to non-canonical, Smad3-independent TGFβ pathway MEK/ERK in SScF [60], the main transcription factors substantially involved in XYLT2 promoter regulation are SP1/3 [29,30,62]. These findings are consistent with previously published data demonstrating dose-dependent inhibition of SMAD3 promoter activity by ERK inhibitor UO126 that correlates with the inhibition of SP1/SP3 function by the same inhibitor [63].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the promoter region of XYLT1, the XYLT2 promoter does not exhibit a binding site for the AP1 transcription factor, which plays a considerable role in the regulation of XYLT1 gene by JNK and p38 [43], explaining why basal XYLT2 expression was not influenced by the usage of p38 and JNK inhibitors in this study. While the XYLT1 promoter exhibits numerous transcription-binding sites for EGR1, which was previously shown to response to non-canonical, Smad3-independent TGFβ pathway MEK/ERK in SScF [60], the main transcription factors substantially involved in XYLT2 promoter regulation are SP1/3 [29,30,62]. These findings are consistent with previously published data demonstrating dose-dependent inhibition of SMAD3 promoter activity by ERK inhibitor UO126 that correlates with the inhibition of SP1/SP3 function by the same inhibitor [63].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The correlation of mRNA expression and enzyme activity increase regarding XT-I has been shown in this and numerous other studies using TGFβ1-treated human dermal and cardiac fibroblasts [26,27,[45][46][47]. Furthermore, we observed, in consistency with previous results in NHDF [25], that the extracellular enzyme activity of untreated cells increased over time due to the protein accumulation in the cell supernatant, while intracellular XT activity remains constant over the test period of 120 h. These findings support the hypothesis that two regulatory mechanisms exist to control enzyme activity in NHDF: One at the transcriptional stage and another operating post-translationally, shedding the Golgi-resident, constitutive active enzyme from the membrane for release to the extracellular space controlling the rate of PG biosynthesis by reducing the cellular enzyme amount [24,29]. In contrast to TGFβ1, activin A treatment of NHDF results in a weaker XYLT1 mRNA expression increase, which can be explained by the autocrine TGFβ1 signalling, which is responsible for sustaining or amplifying the fibrotic responses in the pathogenesis of SSc [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations