2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First detection of frequency-dependent, time-variable dispersion measures

Abstract: Context. High-precision pulsar-timing experiments are affected by temporal variations of the dispersion measure (DM), which are related to spatial variations in the interstellar electron content and the varying line of sight to the source. Correcting for DM variations relies on the cold-plasma dispersion law which states that the dispersive delay varies with the squared inverse of the observing frequency. This may however give incorrect measurements if the probed electron content (and therefore the DM) varies … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 2, this is in the range (2 − 6) × 10 −6 pc cm −3 , depending on the quality of detection. This is already an order of magnitude better than what is currently achievable at timing frequencies (3×10 −5 pc cm −3 ; Jones et al 2017), and even the most recent work of Donner et al (2019), who reach a similar level of precision. Since our analysis relied on the use of a single template (and not frequency-dependent templates that are ideal for wideband timing), there is indeed scope for considerable improvement as we accrue more data with the MWA.…”
Section: Dm Measurements and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As can be seen in Table 2, this is in the range (2 − 6) × 10 −6 pc cm −3 , depending on the quality of detection. This is already an order of magnitude better than what is currently achievable at timing frequencies (3×10 −5 pc cm −3 ; Jones et al 2017), and even the most recent work of Donner et al (2019), who reach a similar level of precision. Since our analysis relied on the use of a single template (and not frequency-dependent templates that are ideal for wideband timing), there is indeed scope for considerable improvement as we accrue more data with the MWA.…”
Section: Dm Measurements and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…While a single LOFAR station such as FR606 only has a limited effective area, it allows us to take advantage of very flexible scheduling, especially for long observations or high cadence monitoring. The capability of this setup for pulsar science has already been demonstrated (Rajwade et al 2016;Mereghetti et al 2016Mereghetti et al , 2018Grießmeier et al 2018;Bondonneau et al 2018;Tiburzi et al 2019;Michilli et al 2018a,b;Hermsen et al 2018;Donner et al 2019).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, the relative amplitudes of the components seem to be frequency-dependent. Pulsar B2217+47 is highly affected by time-variable scattering (Michilli et al 2018a;Donner et al 2019). This effect, convolved with the profile, produces a frequency dependent exponential tail which is clearly visible in Figure 4.…”
Section: Detected Pulsarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to use low-frequency observations to measure the DM very precisely and use these measurements to correct the higher-frequency ToAs, which are often more sensitive and less affected by IISM effects. One potential complication of this approach is the possibility of frequency-dependent DMs (Cordes et al 2016;Donner et al 2019), which are caused by the fact that due to interstellar scattering, low-frequency observations effectively sample a larger volume of the IISM and are sensitive to IISM structures on a larger scale than at high frequencies. Therefore, dispersive delays measured at low frequency may not be representative for those experienced at high frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%