1993
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90769-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First evidence of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later it was confirmed in the electron-positron collider experiment [4] and the photon beam experiment [5]. The excited state Ω 0 c (2770) with I(J P ) = 0( 3 2 + ) was first observed in the radiative decay Ω 0 c (2770) → Ω 0 c (2695) + γ by the BaBar Collaboration [6], and then confirmed by the Belle Collaboration [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Later it was confirmed in the electron-positron collider experiment [4] and the photon beam experiment [5]. The excited state Ω 0 c (2770) with I(J P ) = 0( 3 2 + ) was first observed in the radiative decay Ω 0 c (2770) → Ω 0 c (2695) + γ by the BaBar Collaboration [6], and then confirmed by the Belle Collaboration [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The decay mode Ω 0 c → Ω − π + was observed for the first time by E687 [6]. They reported 10.3 ± 3.9 events over the background of 5.8 events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been observed independently in several decay modes by different experiments [1] and in a variety of production environments, including e + e − colliders operating at the Υ(4S) resonance [2][3][4], photoproduction [5][6][7], and hyperon beams [8]. So Beyond the requirement to produce at least one ss pair during fragmentation, we would expect these three types of decays to be further suppressed by the limited phase space, by |V us | 2 , and by needing to produce a second ss pair, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%