2022
DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Experience With Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption Therapy After Lung Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After excluding irrelevant articles (i.e., reviews, meta-analyses, protocols, letters), 60 studies were retrieved ( Figure 2 ). Of these, 22 were excluded due to their focus on veno-arterial ECMO (V-A ECMO) or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Fourteen studies were excluded for lack or scarcity of data on CytoSorb© use [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], four because of the lack of specific data for the ECMO subgroup [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ], four because CytoSorb© was not used concomitantly with ECMO therapy [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ], two because outcomes of interest for the simultaneous use of CytoSorb© and ECMO were not reported [ 75 , 76 ], and one because it focused on a different device [ 77 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding irrelevant articles (i.e., reviews, meta-analyses, protocols, letters), 60 studies were retrieved ( Figure 2 ). Of these, 22 were excluded due to their focus on veno-arterial ECMO (V-A ECMO) or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Fourteen studies were excluded for lack or scarcity of data on CytoSorb© use [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], four because of the lack of specific data for the ECMO subgroup [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ], four because CytoSorb© was not used concomitantly with ECMO therapy [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ], two because outcomes of interest for the simultaneous use of CytoSorb© and ECMO were not reported [ 75 , 76 ], and one because it focused on a different device [ 77 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effectiveness of the CytoSorb device in LTx has yet to be established. Other than our feasibility study (NCT05242289) and a smaller case series that was rescued with extracorporeal cytokine adsorption therapy following LTx [ 10 ], this tool has not been applied to human LTx by any clinic within our network or in any trials that are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov or other registries. Therefore, this clinical investigation is justified and relevant as it will establish the effectiveness of cytokine reduction by cytokine filtration using the CytoSorb device in improving lung function following LTx, an area where there is a high unmet need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Similarly, in a pilot study involving humans, adsorption during the initial 24 hours after lung transplantation did not yield any significant differences in plasma IL-6 and IL-8 levels. 10 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 Moreover, a recent pilot study in 6 humans demonstrated the safety of CytoSorb when used within the first 24 hour after lung transplantation in an ECMO setting, with no adverse events reported except for one cartridge clotting at 12 hours. 10 A recent review of 170 clinical studies also concluded positively on the safety of the adsorber. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation