2017
DOI: 10.1134/s002136401709003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First experimental observation of the conical effect in Smith–Purcell radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 according to Eqs. ( 19) and ( 20) is generally lim- ited by a decreasing exponential, which always appears in the spectral-angular distribution of radiation from a single particle in the presence of the target edge: (23) where h is the impact parameter, i.e., the shortest distance between the center of the bunch and the target surface. In this case, a geometric constraint occurs: it is clear that the transverse size of the bunch should be smaller than the distance between its center and the target surface, i.e., (24) We note that condition (24) in the practical case of particles with ultrarelativistic energies is taken with the more stringent form h ≫ r 0 , because beams are usually separated by distances noticeably exceeding the transverse size of the beam in order to prevent the induction of radioactivity in targets by the halo of the beam.…”
Section: Estimate Of the Contribution Of The Incoherent Form Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 according to Eqs. ( 19) and ( 20) is generally lim- ited by a decreasing exponential, which always appears in the spectral-angular distribution of radiation from a single particle in the presence of the target edge: (23) where h is the impact parameter, i.e., the shortest distance between the center of the bunch and the target surface. In this case, a geometric constraint occurs: it is clear that the transverse size of the bunch should be smaller than the distance between its center and the target surface, i.e., (24) We note that condition (24) in the practical case of particles with ultrarelativistic energies is taken with the more stringent form h ≫ r 0 , because beams are usually separated by distances noticeably exceeding the transverse size of the beam in order to prevent the induction of radioactivity in targets by the halo of the beam.…”
Section: Estimate Of the Contribution Of The Incoherent Form Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the above consideration is also applicable to a modulated beam [23,24] or the measurement of polarization radiation [25].…”
Section: Estimate Of the Contribution Of The Incoherent Form Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and 2). This effect was discussed in [19], analytically described in [18], and experimentally proved in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the present paper this method is applied to the case of oblique incidence of the particle on the plate (but parallel to the plate's edge) as well as to the periodic set of such plates (Smith-Purcell radiation). The oblique incidence of the particle (both in the case of the single plate and in the case of the periodic grating of such plates) leads to the so called conical effect in the radiation angular distribution recently observed in [4]. We outline that the origin of this effect lies in the superluminal motion along the plate's edge of the disturbance produced by the incident particle's field in the plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%