1998
DOI: 10.1029/98gl01579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First gaseous ion composition measurements in the exhaust plume of a jet aircraft in flight: Implications for gaseous sulfuric acid, aerosols, and chemiions

Abstract: indicates that the ions observed in the plume were entrained ambient atmospheric ions. By contrast no indications for negative chemiions (with masses < 1100 amu) produced by the airbus engines were found in the plume. Furthermore our measurements indicate a modest decrease of the total concentration of entrained negative ions in the plume compared to the ambient atmosphere outside the plume. This decrease may be due to ion-removal by ion-attachment to aerosol-particles and/or ion-recombination with positive ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, ion concentrations larger than 10 9 cm -3 are needed, in a model based on the dominant role of ions in ultrafine particles formation (Yu and Turco, 1998), in order to obtain a satisfactory comparison with the available measurements. Very recently, in-flight measurements have been reported (Arnold et al, 1998b(Arnold et al, , 1999, but for plume ages larger than 0.3 s. Unfortunately, at such plume ages the data are more difficult to analyse due to the complexity of ionremoval processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, ion concentrations larger than 10 9 cm -3 are needed, in a model based on the dominant role of ions in ultrafine particles formation (Yu and Turco, 1998), in order to obtain a satisfactory comparison with the available measurements. Very recently, in-flight measurements have been reported (Arnold et al, 1998b(Arnold et al, , 1999, but for plume ages larger than 0.3 s. Unfortunately, at such plume ages the data are more difficult to analyse due to the complexity of ionremoval processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent measurements of particulates in the exhaust plume of aircraft indicate that the known mechanisms for sulfur dioxide oxidation are not rapid enough to explain sulfuric acid aerosol formation in combustion exhaust [Fahey et al, 1995; Toon amt Miake-Lye, 1998, and references therein]. One possible explanation is that ions formed during combustion [Yu and Turco, 1997] or entrained from ambient air [Arnold et al, 1998] may enhance particle formation. A second possibility is that soot particles catalyze the oxidation of sulfur dioxide to sulfuric acid, resulting in much higher conversion rates compared to gas-phase oxidation of SO 2 [Schumann, et al, 1996;Fahey et al, 1995;Novakov, 1982].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second, neutral mode of particles formed by classical homogeneous nucleation and controlled in number by the FSC is •so believed to be present in the exhaust plume, but may be too small to be detectable at typical FSCs. The presence of chemi-ions in aircraft engine exhaust has been been documented; however, measurements of chemi-ion concentrations and properties both on the ground and in flight are very sparse and represent lower limits [Arnold et al, 1998a[Arnold et al, , 1998b[Arnold et al, , 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%