2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0959270902002010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First indications of a sharp population decline in the globally threatened Spoon-billed Sandpiper Eurynorhynchus pygmeus

Abstract: SummarySpoon-billed Sandpiper Eurynorhynchus pygmeus is classed as globally Vulnerable, based on the only available population estimate, made in 1977, of 2,000-2,800 pairs. Surveys for breeding Spoon-billed Sandpipers were carried out in summer 2000 on the Anadyr estuary coast, the Chukotka autonomous region, Russia. Although six new breeding sites were found, only 16-17 breeding males/pairs were recorded on the northern coast of the Anadyr estuary and five males/pairs on the southern coast and more southerly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings, integrated across the arctic foothills region of Alaska, indicate that: (i) Lapland longspurs and White‐crowned sparrows select distinct and nonoverlapping nest sites, with Lapland longspurs nesting only in E. vaginatum ‐dominated tussock tundra where shrub height does not exceed 20 cm, and White‐crowned sparrows nesting primarily under moderate height shrubs ranging from 20 cm to 1 m in height, regardless of shrub species; (ii) increasing shrub dominance in northern Alaska may be accompanied by a reduction in total arthropod biomass, but since flies are the primary food source for both nesting Lapland longspurs and White‐crowned sparrows and their nestlings, and they are more abundant in shrubs, the availability of their preferred food source may be enhanced; (iii) by 2050, we predict the expansion of shrub‐dominated communities and tree cover mosaic will result in a ~20–60% increase in White‐crowned sparrow nesting habitat extent, and a decline of ~20–60% in Lapland longspur nesting habitat, suggesting that habitat for songbird species with similar nesting preferences will change in a similar manner; (iv) there is a mismatch between the resolution of existing vegetation models and the scale of habitat characteristics that are important to songbirds which enables only first approximations of their future habitat extents, and this limitation likely extends to other wildlife. Our study thus complements and broadens current understanding of how changing tundra vegetation cover will impact arctic breeding birds since the majority of research in this field has focused on migratory waterbirds whose arctic breeding habitat extent is predicted to shrink by 25–85% over the current century (Zöckler, ; Zöckler & Lysenko, ; Tomkovich et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings, integrated across the arctic foothills region of Alaska, indicate that: (i) Lapland longspurs and White‐crowned sparrows select distinct and nonoverlapping nest sites, with Lapland longspurs nesting only in E. vaginatum ‐dominated tussock tundra where shrub height does not exceed 20 cm, and White‐crowned sparrows nesting primarily under moderate height shrubs ranging from 20 cm to 1 m in height, regardless of shrub species; (ii) increasing shrub dominance in northern Alaska may be accompanied by a reduction in total arthropod biomass, but since flies are the primary food source for both nesting Lapland longspurs and White‐crowned sparrows and their nestlings, and they are more abundant in shrubs, the availability of their preferred food source may be enhanced; (iii) by 2050, we predict the expansion of shrub‐dominated communities and tree cover mosaic will result in a ~20–60% increase in White‐crowned sparrow nesting habitat extent, and a decline of ~20–60% in Lapland longspur nesting habitat, suggesting that habitat for songbird species with similar nesting preferences will change in a similar manner; (iv) there is a mismatch between the resolution of existing vegetation models and the scale of habitat characteristics that are important to songbirds which enables only first approximations of their future habitat extents, and this limitation likely extends to other wildlife. Our study thus complements and broadens current understanding of how changing tundra vegetation cover will impact arctic breeding birds since the majority of research in this field has focused on migratory waterbirds whose arctic breeding habitat extent is predicted to shrink by 25–85% over the current century (Zöckler, ; Zöckler & Lysenko, ; Tomkovich et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the nature of the terrain, fledgling success was even more difficult to estimate but from behaviour of the adults and observation of juvenile birds, fledgling success of broods was estimated at 50% of the mean observed brood size in 2003, 2004 and 2007 and 40% in 2005. For further details on breeding survey techniques see Tomkovich and Soloviev (2000), Tomkovich et al (2002) and Syroechkovskiy (2005).…”
Section: Estimating Rates Of Decline On the Wintering Groundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species breeds in the Russian Arctic, primarily on the coast of the Chukotsk Peninsula (e.g. Flint and Kondratiev 1977, Tomkovich et al 2002) and winters mainly in the intertidal habitats of Bangladesh, Myanmar, Vietnam, southern China and the inner Gulf of Thailand (Zöckler et al 2010b, BirdLife International 2016, Bird et al 2010, Chowdhury et al 2011, Zöckler et al 2016). Between 2002 and 2009 numbers at monitored breeding sites declined by about 26% per year (Zöckler et al 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%