2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First international 26Al interlaboratory comparison – Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Merchel and Bremser, 2004). The half-lives used and the standardisation method employed at ASTER (SM-Al-11/07KNSTD) imply that the 26 Al/ 10 Be spallation production ratio is ~6.61 ± 0.52.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Merchel and Bremser, 2004). The half-lives used and the standardisation method employed at ASTER (SM-Al-11/07KNSTD) imply that the 26 Al/ 10 Be spallation production ratio is ~6.61 ± 0.52.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merchel and Bremser have prepared a paper that described the first international Al-26 inter-laboratory comparison. 201 This paper is actually an extension of previous work, but because the results were produced by seven radionuclide counting laboratories, it is still worth mentioning The meteorite sample was analyzed by all the participating laboratories and the results produced showed good overall agreement, although after detailed statistical analysis including some multivariate approaches, there was some evidence of inter-laboratory bias. Richter and co-workers have produced two papers discussing the preparation and certification of synthetic U isotope mixtures 202 and the recertification of a series of U isotope reference materials.…”
Section: Nuclear Materialsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Four meteorite samples were distributed in a round robin exercise to address this issue. 373 Although the results were not statistically different from each other, on further examination some bias between different laboratories was observed; more work on evaluating and stating measurement uncertainty is required. 4.4.5 X-ray techniques.…”
Section: Magnetic Sector Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 82%