2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22237-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First line antiretroviral treatment failure and its association with drug substitution and sex among children in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) has significantly decreased HIV-related morbidity and mortality among children despite the issue of drug resistance and subsequent treatment failure appearing as a challenge. Different studies have been conducted in Ethiopia regarding the prevalence of first-line ART failure among children but the magnitudes of these studies were inconsistent and had great variability. This review aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of first line ART failure among children and its association… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our observations, a recent systematic review observed that female children were at higher risk of first-line ART failure than male children [ 11 ]. However, a systematic review of observational studies published between January 1998 and November 2013 revealed no sex difference in virologic or immunologic treatment outcomes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our observations, a recent systematic review observed that female children were at higher risk of first-line ART failure than male children [ 11 ]. However, a systematic review of observational studies published between January 1998 and November 2013 revealed no sex difference in virologic or immunologic treatment outcomes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Using the tool as a protocol, the reviewers (MG, TF) will use the blinded review approach to evaluate the quality of the original articles. Those studies with scores five or more in JBI criteria will be considered to have a good quality 22. Discrepancies in the quality assessment will be resolved through a third author (ET).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies with scores five or more in JBI criteria will be considered to have a good quality. 22 Discrepancies in the quality assessment will be resolved through a third author (ET). Risk of bias will be assessed by Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of Open access bias, 23 classification of 'high', 'low' or 'unclear' risk of bias, and it can be found as online supplemental file 3.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the tool as a protocol, the three reviewers (MG, ET and EK) evaluate the quality of the original articles independently. Those studies, scores 5 or more in JBI criteria were considered to have good quality and included in the review [ 35 ]. Discrepancies in the quality assessment were resolved through the involvement of the authors (TF and AM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%