“…The formation, which is part of the more broadly distributed Chubut Group (sensu Codignotto et al, 1978), was the focus of several regional studies and compilations lacking a detailed sedimentary framework (Figari and Courtade, 1993;Cortiñas, 1996;Figari, 2005;Ranalli et al, 2011;Figari et al, 2015). Some local and relatively exhaustive palaeoenvironmental inferences have been included in sedimentological papers from partial sections of some stratigraphic intervals (Manassero et al, 2000;Cladera et al, 2004;Foix et al, 2012;Carmona et al, 2016), and in palaeontological contributions (Genise et al, 2010;de la Fuente et al, 2011;Argañaraz et al, 2013;Perez et al, 2013a,b;Passalia et al, 2015;Sterli et al, 2015). The palaeontological topic acquires significance, since the Cerro Barcino Formation has yielded some of the most complete titanosauriform remains (e.g., the titanosauriform Chubutisaurus; del Corro, 1975;Salgado, 1993;Carballido et al, 2011) and an undescribed gigantic basal titanosaur from Las Plumas zone, eastward from the study area (Carmona et al, 2016).…”