1999
DOI: 10.1029/1999ja900226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First observations of polar mesosphere summer echoes in Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
66
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution among different volume reflectivities, the height variation and the diurnal variation of mean reflectivities and occurrence rates are very similar to the same at the two sites. This contradicts earlier suggestions of large-scale asymmetry between the Arctic and the Antarctic, [Woodman et al, 1999] and confirms and further quantifies the observation by Morris et al [2004Morris et al [ , 2006 that Antarctic PMSE (at 68°S) are similar to Arctic PMSE. Only small differences in mean intensities are found between the sites, with NH PMSE 2 -3 times stronger below 87 km.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution among different volume reflectivities, the height variation and the diurnal variation of mean reflectivities and occurrence rates are very similar to the same at the two sites. This contradicts earlier suggestions of large-scale asymmetry between the Arctic and the Antarctic, [Woodman et al, 1999] and confirms and further quantifies the observation by Morris et al [2004Morris et al [ , 2006 that Antarctic PMSE (at 68°S) are similar to Arctic PMSE. Only small differences in mean intensities are found between the sites, with NH PMSE 2 -3 times stronger below 87 km.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The first attempts to observe PMSE in the SH (at 62°S, geomagnetic latitude 47°S) were unsuccessful [Balsley et al, 1993] and subsequent measurements at the same site found only weak PMSE [Woodman et al, 1999]. This was interpreted as evidence for a substantial difference (7.5 K) in summer mesopause temperatures between the Arctic and the Antarctic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reports regarding latitude dependence are somewhat contradictory: Lübken et al (2004b) found PMSE to be more prevalent at higher latitudes in the European sector, whereas Huaman et al (2001) found PMSE to be less prevalent at higher latitude. Initial measurements of PMSE in the Southern Hemisphere failed to detect any PMSE at 62 • S latitude (Balsley et al, 1993), and later measurements from the same site showed only weak PMSE (Woodman et al, 1999). This could be interpreted as a large temperature difference of 7.5 K between the two hemispheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation reinforced previous conclusions that there are large differences between the strength of PMSE observed in the two hemispheres. Woodman et al (1999) attributed this asymmetry to differences in mesopause temperature between the two sites. Huaman and Balsley (1999) suggested that differences in water vapour and dynamics might be the cause of the observed lag in PMSE occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First experiments for PMSE observations in the Southern Hemisphere were carried out by Balsley et al (1993) analysis of these observations led to the conclusion that there are no PMSE at this latitude (Balsley et al, 1993) or, if they exist at all, these echoes had to be at least 34 to 44 dB weaker than their NH counterparts (Balsley et al, 1995). One year later the first SH PMSE were observed with the improved radar at Machu Picchu (Woodman et al, 1999). This observation reinforced previous conclusions that there are large differences between the strength of PMSE observed in the two hemispheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%