1983
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1983.1143116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-order equivalent current and corner diffraction scattering from flat plate structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using E'-Ei onS. (29) primed and unprimed coordinates to denote the source and field point, respectively,…”
Section: (8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using E'-Ei onS. (29) primed and unprimed coordinates to denote the source and field point, respectively,…”
Section: (8)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. The UTD field of these corner diffracted a previous one which was constructed heuristically [29]. rays illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Pathak: Techn4ques Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ando et al [21][22][23][24] used a new coordinate to novel expressions for not only fringe but also PO and GTD equivalent edge currents without any false singularities. Besides, Sunuhara et al [25] calculated the scattering of polyhedron structures by separated equivalent edge current method based on Sikta et al [26] who used the equivalent current concept to compute the scattering patterns of flat plate structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canonical problem of the plane angular sector was solved by Satterwhite and Kouyoumjian [3,4], but the series expansion of the solution is hard to compute and not well-suited for a practical asymptotic evaluation. Most of the literature on this topic presents formulations based on numerical or hybrid techniques [5][6][7] or on approximate, high-frequency methods [8][9][10][11][12][13]. In particular, a heuristic corner diffraction coefficient was conjectured in [8]; however, although it provided surprisingly good results in certain specific examples, its general applicability may be questionable [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%