2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First principle electronic structure calculations of ternary alloys Hg1−xMnxTe in zinc-blende structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained coefficient of determination R 2 for the fit was 0.984, showing that the evaluated lattice parameter ( a 0 ) dependence on the Mn concentration follows a linear trend as a 0 = (6.650 ± 0.013) − (0.28 ± 0.02) x . Our results are, then, in good agreement with Verma et al, in which, from their published results obtained with the LAPW method, we have found a 0 = (6.6506 ± 0.0008) − (0.2867 ± 0.0014) x . This means that, in the zincblende structure, the lattice parameter dependence on Mn concentration follows the Vegard rule.…”
Section: Results and Discusssionssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained coefficient of determination R 2 for the fit was 0.984, showing that the evaluated lattice parameter ( a 0 ) dependence on the Mn concentration follows a linear trend as a 0 = (6.650 ± 0.013) − (0.28 ± 0.02) x . Our results are, then, in good agreement with Verma et al, in which, from their published results obtained with the LAPW method, we have found a 0 = (6.6506 ± 0.0008) − (0.2867 ± 0.0014) x . This means that, in the zincblende structure, the lattice parameter dependence on Mn concentration follows the Vegard rule.…”
Section: Results and Discusssionssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The evaluated spin‐polarized GGA electronic band structures close to the band gap region of Hg 1− x Mn x Te for x = 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0, are shown in Figure . We would like to mention that these results are in good agreement with the previous theoretical results . In fact, the top of the VB and the bottom of the CB are located at the Γ point.…”
Section: Results and Discusssionssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our hybrid DFT/Hartree-Fock calculations for the bandgaps of antiferromagnetic (ground-state) phases are in good agreement with experiments. In contrast, standard DFT calculations strongly underestimate bandgaps (leading to non-existing metallic phases) and overestimate energy differences between magnetic structures [29]. The calculations also show that the modification of the magnetic ordering from anti-to ferromagnetic leads to a significant bandgap reduction, resulting in a metal/insulator transition at higher Mn concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%