2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles based kinetic modeling of effect of hydrogen on growth of carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen to use ambient pressure conditions, as they are technologically more attractive, and to feed methane, to not complicate the interpretation of the results. In fact, for the understanding of the graphene formation mechanism it is a necessity to give attention to the number of gas phase transformations of the precursor molecules [39] before they reach the catalyst surface: this parameter can lead to a very different gas composition with respect to the reactor inlet gas. A reaction temperature of 950 • C has been chosen as the best compromise between economic implications and the need to decompose the "stable" methane molecules, also resulting in high quality materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen to use ambient pressure conditions, as they are technologically more attractive, and to feed methane, to not complicate the interpretation of the results. In fact, for the understanding of the graphene formation mechanism it is a necessity to give attention to the number of gas phase transformations of the precursor molecules [39] before they reach the catalyst surface: this parameter can lead to a very different gas composition with respect to the reactor inlet gas. A reaction temperature of 950 • C has been chosen as the best compromise between economic implications and the need to decompose the "stable" methane molecules, also resulting in high quality materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact mechanism of deactivation is also unknown. It may be amorphous carbon formation [77,81], a cementite (Fe 3 C) to Hä gg carbide (Fe 5 C 2 ) transition [49], dangling bond growth site loses [42], catalyst particle morphology changes [97], adjustment of deposition control mechanism [26] (surface, adsorption, diffusion), declining CNT population density [107], or gas diffusion limitations [108]. The transition between sustained near linear growth and premature deactivation could be determined by weight measurements.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H 2 concentrations at these levels are not required for catalyst reduction, even accounting for gas flow considerations, so the benefits are typically explained by one of two mechanisms: (i) H 2 can increase yields by gasifying amorphous carbon deposits to retain catalytic activity [26,119]; however, at high H 2 concentrations and/or temperatures, this gasification process can become sufficiently aggressive to remove graphitised products and reduce CNTyields [78,81,109,123]; or (ii) H 2 stabilises the growing structure by saturating dangling bonds that would otherwise lead to closure and cessation of growth [42,97,102,119,124,125]. These may occur concurrently with H 2 effects on deposited carbon morphology [109,126,127], by catalyst structural modification [128,129], changes in surface bonding and chemistry [22], and altering carbon/metal diffusion kinetics [57,81].…”
Section: Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since different hydrocarbons are characterized by different sticking coefficients and decomposition energies, the carbon supply rate onto the catalyst surface can be changed (Lebedeva et al 2011). It is generally accepted that the growth is more important to control and predetermine the CNT structure.…”
Section: Some Examples On Kinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%