2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles calculation of activity and selectivity of the partial oxidation of ethylene glycol on Fe(0 0 1), Co(0 0 0 1), and Ni(1 1 1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EG molecule contains two hydroxyl functional groups, and its bidentate nature makes it more difficult for α-H to be in contact with the metal surface, causing the cleavage of the O–H bond to be easier than that of the C–H bond. 52 These results are in agreement with the work by Ozawa, 32 where they studied the scission of C–H and O–H bonds in EG on Co (0001) by DFT calculations and this scission process for the O–H bond is both thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable than C–H bond breaking. In addition, the energy barrier for the cleavage of the O–H bond on the (111) facet representing fcc-Co is the lowest compared with those on the other three facets representing hcp-Co, indicating that fcc-Co is more advantageous for the catalytic dehydrogenation of EG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EG molecule contains two hydroxyl functional groups, and its bidentate nature makes it more difficult for α-H to be in contact with the metal surface, causing the cleavage of the O–H bond to be easier than that of the C–H bond. 52 These results are in agreement with the work by Ozawa, 32 where they studied the scission of C–H and O–H bonds in EG on Co (0001) by DFT calculations and this scission process for the O–H bond is both thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable than C–H bond breaking. In addition, the energy barrier for the cleavage of the O–H bond on the (111) facet representing fcc-Co is the lowest compared with those on the other three facets representing hcp-Co, indicating that fcc-Co is more advantageous for the catalytic dehydrogenation of EG.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…30 PBE functionals have been reported to be successfully used to calculate the activity difference of different crystal facets between fcc-Co and hcp-Co. 20,31 In addition, many first-principles calculations have used PBE to investigate chemical reactions on crystal facets of transition metals and the results were in good agreement with experimental values. [32][33][34][35] Projected augmented wave (PAW) potentials 36,37 were chosen to describe the ionic cores. The cutoff of the plane wave basis set was 400 eV.…”
Section: Computation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7,8]. Due to the advances in recent hardware and computational programs, it became possible to model a molecule interactions with iron surface [9,10,11], which is a step towards the understanding of interactions between an iron surface and a lubricant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for the main reaction of electrochemical oxidation of low MW organic compounds, methods such as designing metal alloy catalysts to modulate intermediate adsorption energy and halt the reaction at glycolate without breaking C–C bonds, or to accelerate C–C bond cleavage and formate release, thereby inhibiting the complete oxidation pathway to CO 2 , have been proposed. 66–72…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozawa et al investigated the first-principles calculation of catalytic activity and selectivity of the EGOR on Fe(001), Co(0001), and Ni(111) model surfaces. 69 The calcu- lation results showed that the order of activation energy for O-H bond dissociation forming HOCH 2 CHO was Co > Ni > Fe, whereas the order of activation energy for C-C bond cleavage resulting in CO 2 generation was Fe > Co > Ni. Therefore, Fe is expected to be a suitable candidate for partial oxidation of EG with less CO 2 generation.…”
Section: Egmentioning
confidence: 96%