2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles calculation of contact electrification and validation by experiment

Abstract: Contact electrification is one of the most well-known phenomena in physics and examples arise in almost every industry. However, the scientific basis of contact charging is unknown. Here, we present a theoretical study of contact electrification, supported by experiments, to calculate for the first time charge transfer between material surfaces from first principles physics. Electronic structure calculations and experiments are performed on single-crystal alumina (sapphire) and silicon oxide (quartz) surfaces,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting parameters were varied 185 until the model showed a reasonable fit to the experimental results for = 1.4 µC m -2 and = 11000 µm 2 . We note that surface charge densities characterized by = 1.4 µC m -2 are reasonable, as they are similar to results found experimentally in glass particle systems (Waitukaitis et al, 2014), and they are significantly smaller than surface charge densities measured for triboelectrically charged quartz (Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Shen et al, 2016). Results…”
Section: Laboratory Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The fitting parameters were varied 185 until the model showed a reasonable fit to the experimental results for = 1.4 µC m -2 and = 11000 µm 2 . We note that surface charge densities characterized by = 1.4 µC m -2 are reasonable, as they are similar to results found experimentally in glass particle systems (Waitukaitis et al, 2014), and they are significantly smaller than surface charge densities measured for triboelectrically charged quartz (Miura and Arakawa, 2007;Shen et al, 2016). Results…”
Section: Laboratory Studiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The maximum electrostatic charge on the surface of a material prior to gas breakdown was found by Matsuyama (2018) to be approximately 400 µC m −2 for a 10 µm particle. The magnitude of the electric field is also difficult to determine and can range over multiple orders of magnitude, with values of up to 200 V m −1 in fair weather electric fields (Adlerman and Williams, 1996;Bennett and Harrison, 2007;Harrison, 2011), up to 15 to 150 kV m −1 in dust storms (Bo and Zheng, 2013;Harrison et al, 2016;Jackson and Farrell, 2006;Schmidt et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 2018), and up to 500 kV m −1 during thunderstorms (Stolzenburg et al, 2007). Since both the charge density and the electric field can vary by orders of magnitude, we consider the product between the two, σ E, to be the important parameter for determining the effects of the electrostatic forces.…”
Section: Modeling Field Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No matter which model is applied, a constant surface charge density is always assumed to quantitatively represent the transferred charges remaining on the surfaces of the tribo-materials, even after contact electrification. The surface charge density can be theoretically calculated using first-principle approaches [ 18 , 19 ]. However, from the contact electrification-based simulation, it is impossible to predict the charge transfer in the external circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%