1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.16192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles calculation of structural and magnetic properties for Fe monolayers and bilayers on W(110)

Abstract: Structure optimizations were performed for 1 and 2 monolayers (ML) of Fe on a 5 ML W(110) substrate employing the all-electron full-potential linearized augmented plane-wave (FP-LAPW) method. The magnetic moments were also obtained for the converged and optimized structures. We find significant contractions (∼ 10 %) for both the Fe-W and the neighboring Fe-Fe interlayer spacings compared to the corresponding bulk W-W and Fe-Fe interlayer spacings. Compared to the Fe bcc bulk moment of 2.2 µB, the magnetic mome… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
65
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
22
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relaxations of the interlayer spacings are stated with respect to the interlayer distances of bulk W͑001͒, W͑110͒, and W͑111͒ layer spacings, respectively, where ⌬d 0 is the relaxation of the interface layer spacing between adatom and W and ⌬d n and ⌬d −n are for the layer spacings that are n layers away from interface in the adatom film and W substrate, respectively. For the case of Fe on W͑110͒, our results are in good agreement with the previous calculations 12 and the experimental data. 13 We see that the first and second Ni monolayers on W͑100͒ and ͑111͒ and the first monolayer of Ni/ W͑110͒ have no magnetic moments.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The relaxations of the interlayer spacings are stated with respect to the interlayer distances of bulk W͑001͒, W͑110͒, and W͑111͒ layer spacings, respectively, where ⌬d 0 is the relaxation of the interface layer spacing between adatom and W and ⌬d n and ⌬d −n are for the layer spacings that are n layers away from interface in the adatom film and W substrate, respectively. For the case of Fe on W͑110͒, our results are in good agreement with the previous calculations 12 and the experimental data. 13 We see that the first and second Ni monolayers on W͑100͒ and ͑111͒ and the first monolayer of Ni/ W͑110͒ have no magnetic moments.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The unit cell contains a vacuum thickness twice that of the ML + slab, as customary. Dipolar effects were computationally corrected, too [63][64][65] 12 ]5p 6 5d 1 6s 2 for Tm. The cutoff energy was set at an optimal value of 600 eV which warrants a convergence of <10 −5 eV for the (110)W slab but just 10 −2 -10 −3 eV when the Tm-ML is considered.…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the relaxed interlayer distances the energy differences between the different magnetic structures were compared in the p(2ϫ2) unit cell. For W, we assumed the experimental lattice constant of a W ϭ3.165 Å and the ideal bcc interlayer spacing, as the W interlayer relaxation is small as shown by Qian and Hübner 28 for Fe on W͑110͒. Due to the large difference in the ͑in-plane͒ lattice constants between Mn and W, pseudomorphic growth conditions introduce a large strain on Mn, and strong Mn interlayer relaxations are expected.…”
Section: A Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%