2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles density functional theory study of phase transformations in NbCr2 and TaCr2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Eb computed in Ref. [8] for US in C14 Cr2Nb (0.28 eV/Cr2Nb) is nearly the same as the Eb of SS in the same system (0.29 eV/Cr2Nb) [7]. Further, the Eb calculated for SS in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Eb computed in Ref. [8] for US in C14 Cr2Nb (0.28 eV/Cr2Nb) is nearly the same as the Eb of SS in the same system (0.29 eV/Cr2Nb) [7]. Further, the Eb calculated for SS in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The initial NEB configurations have been linearly interpolated between the two perfect C14 Simultaneously, the glide of the middle-layer Mg atoms is $ % 〈101 ) 0〉. Without any assumption on the mechanism beside the Burgers vector of the full slip and that the linear interpolation lies in the same energy well as the MEP, it is clear that the MEP of a full shear in the C14 Mg2Al structure corresponds exactly to two successive SSs [5,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of Laves phases, the Gibbs energies of the different layer-sandwich unit stacking modifications differ only slightly (e.g. [25]) and hence the stacking fault energy is also low. Thus, deviations from perfect "ordered glide" are likely.…”
Section: Transformation Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previous works on kinetic aspects of these transformations was of theoretical character [5,19,20]. In a recent experimental work the activation energy for the C14 / C36 transformation of TiCr 2 has been reported to be in the range 107e112 kJ/mol [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%