2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles insights into ammonia decomposition on WC (0001) surface terminated by W and C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WC with C-termination more favors hydrogen production via NH 3 decomposition, while WC with W-termination is easily poisoned via N atoms, resulting in the difficult N atoms combinative desorption. 13 WC with C-termination performs higher activity toward with that with W-termination. 14 WC with W-termination easily activate CO into C and O atoms, 15 and then the successive hydrogenation of C atom to generate CH x (x = 1−3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WC with C-termination more favors hydrogen production via NH 3 decomposition, while WC with W-termination is easily poisoned via N atoms, resulting in the difficult N atoms combinative desorption. 13 WC with C-termination performs higher activity toward with that with W-termination. 14 WC with W-termination easily activate CO into C and O atoms, 15 and then the successive hydrogenation of C atom to generate CH x (x = 1−3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, the termination of WC also impacts the stability of Rh 19 /WC, Rh 31 /WC and Rh 37 /WC catalyst, in which Rh 19 supported on WC with W-termination is the most stable compared with that on C-termination, while the Rh 31 and Rh 37 supported on C-termination is the most stable instead of W-termination. WC with C-termination more favors hydrogen production via NH 3 decomposition, while WC with W-termination is easily poisoned via N atoms, resulting in the difficult N atoms combinative desorption . WC with C-termination performs higher activity toward H 2 O dehydrogenation to OH compared with that with W-termination .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in this work we analyze the capability of WCÀ C and WCÀ W terminations to dissociate H 2 and form a wide range of hydrogen coverages, addressing the thermodynamics conditions to achieve different Θ H values. It is worth highlighting that among WCÀ C and WCÀ W, X. Rao et al [20] and D. Siegel et al [21] found theoretically that WCÀ W was most stable than WCÀ C. These findings could address the choice of WCÀ W as the only termination to study surface chemical reactions. However, from the point of view of a practical catalyst, both WCÀ C and WCÀ W could be exposed; then, we analyze both surfaces in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, in this work we analyze the capability of WC−C and WC−W terminations to dissociate H 2 and form a wide range of hydrogen coverages, addressing the thermodynamics conditions to achieve different Θ H values. It is worth highlighting that among WC−C and WC−W, X. Rao et al [20] . and D. Siegel et al [21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of linear expansion of W 2 C is relatively flat and the value is not large. For WC/Ni composites, the generation of interfacial phase W 2 C helps to regulate the difference of thermophysical properties between Ni and reinforcing particles WC, thus effectively mitigating the stress concentration at the junction of Ni and reinforcing particles, which leads to particle detachment [23,24]. It is apparent that W 2 C is dispersed in the matrix as an intermediate phase.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Analysis Of Interfacial Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%