2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First principles investigation of the structural and bonding properties of hydrated actinide (IV) oxalates, An(C2O4)2·6H2O (An = U, Pu)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most informative descriptions on this topic have derived structural details from geometrically-optimized computational models that -with the exception of Pu(C2O4)2•6H2O and Pu(C2O4)2•2H2O, which have published pXRD patterns -have not been experimentally verified. [7,10,13,15,16] In fact, a 2021 density functional theory (DFT) study of Pu(C2O4)2 decomposition clearly states that the precise structural modifications occurring during thermal decomposition of Pu(C2O4)2 have not been experimentally characterized, but the DFTderived intermediate structures should be identifiable using spectroscopic techniques. [10] Despite over 80 years of research involving the Pu(IV) oxalate method, no Raman spectra of Pu(C2O4)2•6H2O or its degradation products have been reported; the lone exception is the Raman spectrum of the terminal degradation product, PuO2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most informative descriptions on this topic have derived structural details from geometrically-optimized computational models that -with the exception of Pu(C2O4)2•6H2O and Pu(C2O4)2•2H2O, which have published pXRD patterns -have not been experimentally verified. [7,10,13,15,16] In fact, a 2021 density functional theory (DFT) study of Pu(C2O4)2 decomposition clearly states that the precise structural modifications occurring during thermal decomposition of Pu(C2O4)2 have not been experimentally characterized, but the DFTderived intermediate structures should be identifiable using spectroscopic techniques. [10] Despite over 80 years of research involving the Pu(IV) oxalate method, no Raman spectra of Pu(C2O4)2•6H2O or its degradation products have been reported; the lone exception is the Raman spectrum of the terminal degradation product, PuO2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonding properties of An­(IV)-oxalates have been investigated only with U and Pu in hydrated actinide­(IV) oxalates An­(C 2 O 4 ) 2 ·6H 2 O using plane-wave calculations, and it was suggested that the uranium–oxalate bond is more ionic than the plutonium–oxalate bond . The scarcity of studies concerning the description of the An­(IV)–oxalate bond is associated with the difficulties of dealing with polymeric structures in the computations, while monomeric and molecular structures are good candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonding properties of An(IV)-oxalates have been investigated only with U and Pu in hydrated actinide(IV) oxalates An(C 2 O 4 ) 2 •6H 2 O using plane-wave calculations, and it was suggested that the uranium−oxalate bond is more ionic than the plutonium−oxalate bond. 34 The scarcity of studies concerning the description of the An(IV)−oxalate bond is associated with the difficulties of dealing with polymeric structures in the computations, while monomeric and molecular structures are good candidates. Hereafter, we present molecular DFT calculations performed on the homoleptic molecular anions [An(C 2 O 4 ) 5 ] 6− and these results are compared to the hexanitrato An(IV) series [(C 2 H 5 ) 4 N] 2 [An(NO 3 ) 6 ] (with An IV = Th IV , U IV , Np IV , and Pu IV ), which similarly contains only bidentate O-donor ligands but with a greater coordination number (12 versus 10 for oxalate).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice parameters and interatomic distances derived from our modeling procedure (PW1PW functional) deviate from crystallographic values at most by 1.9% and 2.3% for pyrite, 1.7% and 2.7% for marcasite (orthorhombic FeS 2 ), 0.8% and 1.9% for arsenopyrite (FeAsS), 1.4% and 2.5% for löllingite (orthorhombic FeAs 2 ), 0.16% and 5.03% for dzharkenite (cubic FeSe 2 ) (Tables S8–S14). The errors are typical of DFT GGA studies. , The distributions of As and Se were modeled in two supercells of dimensions 2 × 2 × 2 and 3 × 2 × 2. The reciprocal space integration was performed by sampling the Brillouin zone with the 6 × 6 × 6 Pack-Monkhorst mesh, resulting in 112 independent k points.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%