2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.166405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-Principles Photoemission Spectroscopy and Orbital Tomography in Molecules from Koopmans-Compliant Functionals

Abstract: The determination of spectral properties from first principles can provide powerful connections between microscopic theoretical predictions and experimental data, but requires complex electronic-structure formulations that fall outside the domain of applicability of common approaches, such as density-functional theory. We show here that Koopmans-compliant functionals, constructed to enforce piecewise linearity and the correct discontinuity derivative in energy functionals with respect to fractional occupation-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach, elaborated further below, was shown to yield excellent fundamental and optical gaps for molecules [42,43]. More recently, it has been generalized so as to provide accurate single-particle excitations for both molecules [44][45][46] and molecular crystals [38,47], and it was shown to capture gap renormalization in molecular solids [38]. Can this approach, then, resolve the long-standing challenge of providing an accurate one-and two-particle excitation spectrum in solid-state systems fully within the framework of (TD)DFT?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, elaborated further below, was shown to yield excellent fundamental and optical gaps for molecules [42,43]. More recently, it has been generalized so as to provide accurate single-particle excitations for both molecules [44][45][46] and molecular crystals [38,47], and it was shown to capture gap renormalization in molecular solids [38]. Can this approach, then, resolve the long-standing challenge of providing an accurate one-and two-particle excitation spectrum in solid-state systems fully within the framework of (TD)DFT?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) More details on the calculation of I (ν) can be found in Ref. 36. The excitation energy is now expressed in terms of the kinetic energy 2 k 2 /2m of the ejected electron and its binding energy E b i defined as the negative of the Dyson orbital energy ε d i .…”
Section: Ultraviolet Photoemission Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work 28,29,31,32,36 the calculation of α (v) was performed at fixed geometry, assuming the variation of the screening during the geometry optimization to be negligible. In this work we explore self-consistency for α (v) with respect to molecular geometry.…”
Section: Geometry and Screening Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that while the two issues are related in a physical sense, they are not the same and their connection in the construction of reasonable DFAs is far less obvious [34]. Another shortcoming affecting the KS eigenvalues is the deviation of the total energy curve, E(N ), as a function of the number of electrons, N , from piecewise linearity, for fractional N (see, e.g., [14,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]). In the literature, this phenomenon is sometimes referred to as many-electron self-interaction [35][36][37]39] or as a (de-)localization error [38,41,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%