2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-principles simulations of transition state spectra of the I + HI and I + DI reactions and vibrational bonding in IMuI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently,t he vibrational bonding in three atom species is aw ell-established phenomenon but there are also other more complex systems in which upon replacing ap rotonw ith a m + transition-state-like structures are stabilized. [78][79][80][81][82] Although in all these examples as well as in what is considered in this report one is facedw ith the same type of isotope substitution, the detailed mechanism of bonding and stabilization of transition-state-like structuresa re distinct in each case and different from the vibrational bonding. The identification and classificationofv arioustypes of structural variations resulting from replacing ap roton with a m + is an open problem that needs further considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently,t he vibrational bonding in three atom species is aw ell-established phenomenon but there are also other more complex systems in which upon replacing ap rotonw ith a m + transition-state-like structures are stabilized. [78][79][80][81][82] Although in all these examples as well as in what is considered in this report one is facedw ith the same type of isotope substitution, the detailed mechanism of bonding and stabilization of transition-state-like structuresa re distinct in each case and different from the vibrational bonding. The identification and classificationofv arioustypes of structural variations resulting from replacing ap roton with a m + is an open problem that needs further considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although the mainstream view in the chemical community usually assumes that the nuclear mass and its variation are unimportant from structural and bonding viewpoints, the present study and some other recent studies demonstrate that upon sufficiently large mass variations, “chemically” interesting alternations are observable. Currently, the vibrational bonding in three atom species is a well‐established phenomenon but there are also other more complex systems in which upon replacing a proton with a μ + transition‐state‐like structures are stabilized . Although in all these examples as well as in what is considered in this report one is faced with the same type of isotope substitution, the detailed mechanism of bonding and stabilization of transition‐state‐like structures are distinct in each case and different from the vibrational bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This TS is of particular interest, since fluorine atoms often show distinctly different intermolecular interactions, compared to other halogen atoms. For example, the TSs for F • + H 2 → FH + H • and F • + H–Cl → F–H + Cl • , possess bent structures; but, in contrast, the NIPE spectra have been successfully modeled with linear TSs in studies of the heavier halogen analogs in X • + H–Y → X–H + Y • reactions (X, Y ≠ F). , The TS for F • + H–F → F–H + F • has also been predicted to be bent …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] A very interesting aspect of muonium, Mu, chemistry, recently highlighted in the literature, is the possibility of inducing a fundamental change in the nature of chemical bonding by Mu isotopic substitution. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Specifically, rigorous QM calculations have shown that the ''heavy-light-heavy'' system BrLBr, where L is an isotope of hydrogen, can change from van der Waals to vibrational bonding when L = Mu. 8 In contrast to conventional chemical bonding, that is due to a minimum in the potential energy, often associated with a slight increase in ZPE, vibrational bonding results from a decrease in ZPE in a minimum-free potential energy surface (PES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%