“…The above description of the examined specimen is coincided with those given in Karpova et al (2021), Froese and Pauly (2023), Bilecenoğlu et al (2023), Yağlıoğlu et al (2023 andKaradurmuş et al (2024). The morphometric distances of the examined specimen of S. schlegelii are also coincided with those reported in the literature (Karpova et al, 2021;Bilecenoğlu et al, 2023;Yağlıoğlu et al, 2023;Karadurmuş et al, 2024), and the slight differences between the examined and published ratios (as % SL), all of which are in the safe limits for the Korean rockfish, may be arised because of intraspecific allopatry (Moyle and Cech Jr., 1988). The number of observed lachrymal spines (3) in the examined specimen, one of the main descriptive characteristic of S. schlegelii, as well as the number preopercular (5) and opercular (2) spines are also coincided with the numbers reported by Karpova et al (2021), Bilecenoğlu et al (2023) and Yağlıoğlu et al (2023), also confirm the identification of the examined specimen.…”