2013
DOI: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2013.027.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First report ofThielaviopsis paradoxacausing palm fruit rot ofButia capitatain Uruguay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To elucidate the nature and pathogenicity of the potential pathogen, we inoculated tissue-cultured greenhouse-grown date palm plants with the three isolates of the pathogen. Our data were very similar to the data obtained from previous pathogenicity studies of T. paradoxa on Dracaena marginata [ 35 ], Butia capitate [ 36 ], Hyophorbe lagenicaulis [ 37 ], and Cocos nucifera [ 38 ]. Hence, based upon the morphology and sporulation characteristics, it is difficult to distinguish both Thielaviopsis spp., and a DNA-based molecular characterization of the most conserved regions of these fungal pathogens can be an alternative species-specific detection method for black scorch disease in date palm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To elucidate the nature and pathogenicity of the potential pathogen, we inoculated tissue-cultured greenhouse-grown date palm plants with the three isolates of the pathogen. Our data were very similar to the data obtained from previous pathogenicity studies of T. paradoxa on Dracaena marginata [ 35 ], Butia capitate [ 36 ], Hyophorbe lagenicaulis [ 37 ], and Cocos nucifera [ 38 ]. Hence, based upon the morphology and sporulation characteristics, it is difficult to distinguish both Thielaviopsis spp., and a DNA-based molecular characterization of the most conserved regions of these fungal pathogens can be an alternative species-specific detection method for black scorch disease in date palm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Estos rasgos son característicos de T. paradoxa según descripción de clave taxonómica de WATANABE (1937) y estudios realizados por HERNÁNDEZ et al, (2011) en el cultivo de piña, demostrando presencia de T. paradoxa en cultivos de piña en el municipio de San Marcos Sucre. Además, cabe anotar que T. paradoxa ha sido reportada en una gran diversidad de plantas, entre ellas Butia capitata (GEPP et al, 2013) y Dracaena marginata (FIGUEREDO et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified