2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2021.101671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First report of Spirocerca lupi larva in dung beetles (Scarabaeus armeniacus) in the central region of Iran: A morphological and molecular identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1417–1635 μm; this study) or P. sexalatus (940–1728 μm; Seurat, 1915). In addition, S. lupi larvae reported by Seurat (1915), Chhabra, 1968 and those found in this study have a distance from the nerve ring to the anterior end of the body shorter than that from the excretory pore, whereas, it is converse in S. lupi larvae reported by Sen & Anantaraman (1971) and by Mohtasebi et al (2021). These overlaps and differences in morphometric data suggest that misidentification may occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(1417–1635 μm; this study) or P. sexalatus (940–1728 μm; Seurat, 1915). In addition, S. lupi larvae reported by Seurat (1915), Chhabra, 1968 and those found in this study have a distance from the nerve ring to the anterior end of the body shorter than that from the excretory pore, whereas, it is converse in S. lupi larvae reported by Sen & Anantaraman (1971) and by Mohtasebi et al (2021). These overlaps and differences in morphometric data suggest that misidentification may occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…Moreover, the body size and other morphometric data of S. lupi larvae vary among reports. Generally, its body length ranges from 1880-3400 μm (Seurat, 1915;Chhabra, 1968;Mohtasebi et al, 2021;this study), longer than that of Physocephalus larvae (940-1728 μm). However, S. lupi larvae from dung beetles reported by Sen & Anantaraman (1971) is 810-1400 μm in 1915).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations