2016
DOI: 10.4095/298840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First results on velocity analyses of multichannel seismic data acquired with the icebreaker RV Araon across the southern Beaufort Sea, offshore Yukon

Abstract: Abstract:One thousand two hundred twenty kilometres of multichannel seismic data were acquired in the Beaufort Sea in 2013 and 2014 to interpret shallow sedimentary structures associated with the upper Cenozoic Iperk and Shallow Bay depositional sequences. Seismic velocity analyses suggest a remarkably consistent regional velocity-depth trend on the slope within the upper 4 s two-way traveltime. A separate velocity trend was not defined beneath the shelf in this region, where data are influenced by the occurre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Newly acquired 2D MCS data across the shelf-edge region with the icebreaker ARAON in 2013 and 2014 (Jin et al, 2015;Jin and Dallimore, 2016) provide further evidence for the existence of a reflection from the BGHSZ ( Figure 6). Data processing and imaging is, however, challenged by the presence of strong seafloor-multiples that could not be completely removed as described by Riedel et al (2016). Yet, the 2D MCS data generally confirm observations made across the 3D seismic data volumes.…”
Section: Gas Hydrate Stability Zone Beneath Submarine Permafrostmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Newly acquired 2D MCS data across the shelf-edge region with the icebreaker ARAON in 2013 and 2014 (Jin et al, 2015;Jin and Dallimore, 2016) provide further evidence for the existence of a reflection from the BGHSZ ( Figure 6). Data processing and imaging is, however, challenged by the presence of strong seafloor-multiples that could not be completely removed as described by Riedel et al (2016). Yet, the 2D MCS data generally confirm observations made across the 3D seismic data volumes.…”
Section: Gas Hydrate Stability Zone Beneath Submarine Permafrostmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…(Figure 8) was imaged, manifesting very similar character as the BSR off Alaska (compare to Figure 6a in Phrampus et al 2014). Seismic velocity analyses conducted along this seismic line (Riedel et al, 2016) show a clear decrease in the rms-velocity beneath this reflection, indicating the presence of free gas. Both, this and the Alaska-BSR, display gas-brightening of stratigraphic horizons underneath the BSR which cross-cut the phase boundary (CDPs 1500 -1800, Figure 8).…”
Section: Deep-water Marine Gas Hydrate Stability Zone In the Outer Mamentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The KOPRI 2D MCS survey used an airgun array of 1200 in 3 volume and a streamer with 120 channels with maximum offset of 1600 m (Riedel et al, 2016). Seismic data were processed (after crooked-line 2D geometry definition) using a sequence including removal of DC offset, muting of direct arrivals and refractions, minimum phase band-pass filtering, surface-consistent deconvolution, stacking-velocity definition using the semblance technique, staking (full-offset range) and post-stack Kirchhoff time migration using a 2D variable velocity field.…”
Section: Data and Seismic Attribute Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic data were processed (after crooked-line 2D geometry definition) using a sequence including removal of DC offset, muting of direct arrivals and refractions, minimum phase band-pass filtering, surface-consistent deconvolution, stacking-velocity definition using the semblance technique, staking (full-offset range) and post-stack Kirchhoff time migration using a 2D variable velocity field. Details of the processing and interpretation of these 2D MCS data are given in Riedel et al (2016). The MCS data have been used previously to define interval velocities (Riedel et al, 2016) and we use these velocity-depth functions to convert observations on the 2D and 3D data made in two-way travel time to depth (metres below seafloor, mbsf).…”
Section: Data and Seismic Attribute Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation