2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-022-00740-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First rhyncaphytoptine mite (Eriophyoidea, Diptilomiopidae) parasitizing American hazelnut (Corylus americana): molecular identification, confocal microscopy, and phylogenetic position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular phylogenetic analyses in this work were based on the dataset containing the sequences of nothopodines collected in China [ 10 , 12 ]. Similar to our previous work, when we used sequences from GenBank [ 15 ], we again found new erroneous sequences (KF782375, KF782475, and KF782586) wrongly assigned to the nothopodine genus Kuangella , instead of Phyllocoptinae. This emphasized the need to perform careful Blast verifications of the sequences before including them in the analyses and submitting them to publicly available databases, as well as the need to retest the hypotheses, investigated with erroneous sequences included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The molecular phylogenetic analyses in this work were based on the dataset containing the sequences of nothopodines collected in China [ 10 , 12 ]. Similar to our previous work, when we used sequences from GenBank [ 15 ], we again found new erroneous sequences (KF782375, KF782475, and KF782586) wrongly assigned to the nothopodine genus Kuangella , instead of Phyllocoptinae. This emphasized the need to perform careful Blast verifications of the sequences before including them in the analyses and submitting them to publicly available databases, as well as the need to retest the hypotheses, investigated with erroneous sequences included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…( Table 1 ). For this purpose, we used the same methodology and protocols for DNA extraction, library preparation, PCR, genome sequencing, assembly and annotation as described in [ 39 , 40 ]. Three sequence datasets ( Cox1 , 28S and mitogenomic) were made for molecular phylogenetic analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significantly expands our knowledge on genetic diversity of gall mites and facilitates our ability to test their conspecificity [6,20,26,27]. Additionally, various species delimitation methods, as well as Blast and tree-based approaches, facilitate testing species boundaries, validate morphological identification, and detect erroneous sequences of gall mites, like those deposited in public databases [28][29][30]. The latter is especially important for obtaining correct datasets for molecular phylogenetic analyses and avoiding misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For molecular studies, we obtained partial sequences of two genes (Cox1 and 28S) of six calacarines (Table 2) using our previously described methodology and protocols for DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing [30,38]. The new sequences of calacarines were blasted against sequences of Eriophyoidea from GenBank.…”
Section: Molecular Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation