2019
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1698031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-trimester screening-biomarkers and cell-free DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Japan, many small clinics still perform the traditional 4-serum marker test, which is no longer recommended in the United States. 2 On the other hand, some countries around the world have decided that NIPT cannot be introduced as a screening test because of its high cost 7,25 and the 4-serum marker test remains an option for the time being. From this point of view, it is important to clearly present these options other than NIPT to GC clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, many small clinics still perform the traditional 4-serum marker test, which is no longer recommended in the United States. 2 On the other hand, some countries around the world have decided that NIPT cannot be introduced as a screening test because of its high cost 7,25 and the 4-serum marker test remains an option for the time being. From this point of view, it is important to clearly present these options other than NIPT to GC clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important clue, particularly when the paradigm of first-trimester screening is shifted toward cf DNA. In some countries, a first-trimester ultrasound scan is no longer part of the screening protocol [20][21][22][23]. Cf DNA screening without ultrasound will miss cases with increased NT, which is a valuable tool even in cases without apparent anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIPT is an advanced screening test for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome aberrations [31,32], but has currently no value in the detection of many other chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Structural Defects Detectable With 3d Ultrasound In the Firs...mentioning
confidence: 99%