First validation of the technical and administrative staff quality of life at work tool (TASQ@work) in academia

Abstract

IntroductionBased on the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, the present study aimed to validate “The Technical and Administrative Staff Quality of Life At Work” (TASQ@work), a new tool to assess the quality of life at work in academia focused on technical and administrative staff.MethodsThis tool was developed by the QoL@Work research team, a group of expert academics in the field of work and organizational psychology affiliated with the Italian Association of Psychologists. The TASQ@work was elaborated in different steps. The first phase was aimed at the identification of the dimensions of the tool. The second phase was aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the tool. The validation process involved confirmatory analysis and measurement invariance of the various constructs selected. The analyses were performed in a convenience sample of two Italian universities in different regions (one in the Northwest and the second in Central Italy).ResultsThe sample was composed of 1820 Administrative Staff, comprising 69.4% from University 1 (N = 1,263) and 30.6% from University 2 (N = 557). The TASQ@work presented satisfactory psychometric properties (normality of the items, reliability and content, construct and nomological validity) and measurement invariance across gender, seniority, and Athenaeum.DiscussionThe results indicate that the tool can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to assess job demands, job resources, and outcomes in the working life of technical and administrative academic staff. In this perspective, the present study represents the first contribution to the debate on the psychosocial risks in academic contexts by presenting a new tool, the TASQ@work, aimed at contextualizing the JD-R model to understand the role played by psychosocial aspects in affecting the well-being of the academic employees.

Evaluating well-being and psychosocial risks in academia: Is management the “forgotten phase”?

“…One of the network’s missions is to share good practices for assessing and managing WRS risks in universities. The QoL@Work network has developed assessment tools ( Brondino et al, 2022 ; Bruno et al, 2024 ) and a flexible and iterative model to evaluate and manage well-being and WRS risks (described in Ingusci, 2021 ). Based on previous models ( Leka et al, 2008 ; INAIL, 2018 ; Innstrand and Christensen, 2020 ), it consists of defined phases, starting from the constitution of the group responsible for the process to the monitoring system of the improvement actions (see Figure 1 ).…”