First Year Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) Using the CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Engineering Technology in Zebrafish

Abstract

Genetic analysis in model systems can provide a rich context for conceptual understanding of gene structure, regulation, and function. With an intent to create a rich learning experience in molecular genetics, we developed a semester-long course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system to disrupt specific genes in the zebrafish. The course was offered to freshman students; nine students worked in four groups (two to three members per group) to design, synthesize, and test the nuclease activity of the CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/sgRNAs for targeted disruption of specific genes in the zebrafish. Each group worked with a gene with an already known mutant phenotype that can be visually scored and a gene that had not been studied in zebrafish previously. Embedded in the course were a series of workshop-styled units or tutorials, including tours to core facilities. The focus was on introducing and developing skills that could be accommodated within the span of a semester. Each group successfully cloned at least one plasmid-encoding CRISPR/sgRNA template, visually analyzed injected embryos, and performed genotyping assays to detect CRISPR-Cas9 activity. In-class discussions, a final end-of-semester written test, and group oral presentations were assessed for an understanding of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, application of the CRISPR-Cas9 system as a gene manipulation tool, and experimental methods used to create plasmid vectors and synthesize sgRNA. In addition, poster presentations were evaluated by faculty, graduate students, and senior undergraduate students at a University research exposition. Self-reflections in the form of group conversations were video recorded. All students (9/9) distinctly showed learning gains after completing the activity, but the extent of the gains was variable, as seen from results of a written test and poster presentation assessment. Qualitative analysis of evaluations and self-reporting data indicated several gains, suggesting that all students found many aspects of the CURE valuable and gained project-specific (conceptual) and transferrable skills (science process and science identity).

Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations

“…Importantly, underrepresented minority students had larger knowledge gains than other groups, indicating a positive movement toward cultivating successful professionals to bring diversity to their field [64]. Bhatt and Challa designed an introductory course which taught genomic principles through hands-on experience with CRISPR-Cas9, which has become one of the most important genome-editing tools in modern science [65]. The study utilized zebrafish to analyze genetic mutations with their corresponding phenotype and allowed students to design and test CRISPR-Cas9 templates in order to disrupt certain zebrafish genes.…”

An undergraduate laboratory experience using CRISPR‐cas9 technology to deactivate green fluorescent protein expression in Escherichia coli

“…CUREs using CRISPR‐cas9 technology to edit genes of Drosophila and Zebrafish and screen for induced phenotypes provided valuable experiences for undergraduate students . When assessed, both CUREs reported increased learning gains and research competencies.…”

An undergraduate laboratory module that uses the CRISPR/Cas9 system to generate frameshift mutations in yeast

“…A central responsibility of educators at universities and colleges is to incorporate the latest technological advances into teaching labs, and thus it is important that undergraduate students have first‐hand experience with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. While some teaching labs using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing have already been designed , they typically require complex and expensive cell culture systems that may not be feasible for smaller, teaching‐centered institutions of higher learning. Using yeast as a model organism to teach CRISPR‐associated concepts to undergraduate students is ideal because it is inexpensive, easy to use, and provides an opportunity to perform gene editing in a eukaryotic system.…”