Fiscal Decentralization and Development: An Analysis of City Governments in Argentina and Mexico, 1980–2010

Abstract

This dissertation examines local governments' efforts to promote economic development in Latin America. The research uses a mixed method to explore how cities make decisions to innovate, develop, and finance economic development programs. First, this study provides a comparative analysis of decentralization policies in Argentina and Mexico as a means to gain a better understanding of the degree of autonomy exercised by local governments. Then, it analyzes three local governments each within the province of Santa Fe, Argentina and the State of Guanajuato, Mexico. The principal hypothesis of this dissertation is that if local governments collect more own-source tax revenue, they are more likely to promote economic development and thus, in turn, promote growth for their region. By examining six cities, three of which are in Santa Fe-Rosario, Santa Fe (capital) and Rafaela-and three in Guanajuato-Leon, Guanajuato (capital) and San Miguel de Allende, this dissertation provides a better understanding of public finances and tax collection efforts of local governments in Latin America. Specific attention is paid to each city's budget authority to raise new revenue and efforts to promote economic development. The research also includes a large statistical dataset of Mexico's 2,454 municipalities and a x regression analysis that evaluates local tax efforts on economic growth, controlling for population, territorial size, and the professional development. In order to generalize these results, the research tests these discoveries by using statistical data gathered from a survey administered to Latin American municipal officials. The dissertation demonstrates that cities, which experience greater fiscal autonomy measured by the collection of more own-source revenue, are better able to stimulate effective economic development programs, and ultimately, create jobs within their communities. The results are bolstered by a large number of interviews, which were conducted with over 100 finance specialists, municipal presidents, and local authorities. The dissertation also includes an in-depth literature review on fiscal federalism, decentralization, debt financing and local development. It concludes with a discussion of the findings of the study and applications for the practice of public administration. xi

What Encourages Cities to Become Sustainable? Measuring the Effectiveness of Implementing Local Adaptation Policies

“…Although the main source of revenue for the majority of municipalities comes from federal transfers, a growing number of municipalities are making substantial efforts to improve their capacity to collect revenue from diverse sources (Smith, 2012). This effort is important to maintain the operation of a local government, especially if federal funding becomes constrained for any reason.…”

The Practices and Challenges of Fiscal Decentralization: A Case of Bedelle Woreda, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

“…Essentially, fiscal decentralization is a specific process meant to alter the financial state of affairs (Boschmann, 2009). Scholars suggest that fiscal decentralization is more efficient by allowing local governments to determine the appropriate level of service delivery and creating competition between local governments while allowing voters to move from one jurisdiction to another to obtain an optimal preference of service provision (Smith, 2012).…”

“…It also outlined the respective spheres of authority and responsibilities of the Federal Government and the Regional States (WorldBank, 2010) Currently, fiscal decentralization is seen as part of a reform agenda to strengthen regional and local governments. In contrast, Smith (2012) suggests that local governments or administrative units possess the legal authority to impose taxes in many developing countries, but the tax base is so weak and the dependence on central government subsidies so ingrained that no attempt is made to exercise their authority. This is because the central government alone cannot satisfy all of the competing needs of its constituent units.…”

Improving fiscal federal relations for a stronger Mexico

“…Mayors in Mexico can only run for a single three year term and with each new election cycle the mayor must nominate new staff. What typically happens is that a complete new team of top and middle management public officials is appointed and most previous administrations do not leave any records behind (Smith, 2012). Another major problem is weak incentives to collect higher property taxes.…”

“…Another major problem is weak incentives to collect higher property taxes. Empirical evidence on the relationship between federal transfers and local tax efforts in Mexico suggests that past increases in federal transfers have had a negative effect on local tax collection, in particular, property tax collection (Smith, 2012). Arguably given the choice, a local policymaker prefers to rely on federal transfers to finance public goods, instead of increasing local taxes, especially given that it entails a political cost.…”