Fiscal decentralization, revenue and expenditure assignments, and growth in China

Abstract

Theory suggests that a close match between revenue and expenditure assignments at sub-national levels benefits allocative efficiency, and hence economic growth. That is, a convergence of revenue and expenditure assignments at sub-national levels of government should, according to the theory, be positively associated with a higher growth rate. In the case of China, this paper shows, divergence, rather than convergence, in revenue and expenditures at the sub-national level of government is associated with higher rates of growth. A panel dataset for 30 provinces in China is used to examine the relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth over two phases of fiscal decentralization in China: (1) 1979-1993 under the fiscal contract system, and (2) 1994-1999 under the tax assignment system. The seeming contradiction between the theory and evidence in the China case is reconciled by taking into account the institutional arrangements that prevailed during the two phases of fiscal decentralization, in particular the inconsistency between the assumptions of the theory of fiscal decentralization and the institutional reality of China. # 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.JEL classification: H2; H7; O1

Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Selected European Countries

“…The estimated coefficient of fiscal decentralization is statistically significant and positive at 1% level. It is interesting to note that this pattern is consistent with the empirical studies of Jin and Zou (2005) and Zhang and Zou (1998). R 2 and Adjusted R 2 have been calculated by Eviews.…”

“…In Table 1, summarized empirical findings of researches on the impact of FD on economic growth in cross -countries, are presented: The most widely used cases in the regional studies are obviously Chinese provinces and American states, because both countries offer sufficient samples (50 American states and 28 Chinese provinces) substantial heterogeneity among region in terms of economic and fiscal performance and reliable statistical data for a long period of time. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on the direction and significance of this relationship (Zhang, Zou 1998;Lin, Liu 2000;Jin, Zou 2005;Akai et al 2009). In Table 2, summarized empirical findings of studies on the influence of FD or federalism on economic growth in the Chinese, Spanish and USA, are presented.…”

Can Fiscal Decentralization Alleviate Government Consumption Volatility?

“…Related to that, a number of authors have recently started to investigate the different implications of revenue versus expenditure decentralization in relation to GDP growth (e.g., Jin and Zou 2005;Gemmell et al 2013), fiscal discipline (e.g., Afonso and Hauptmeier 2009;Escolano et al 2012), or income distribution (Boadway et al 2003;Sacchi and Salotti 2013). As expected, this has resulted in different empirical findings depending on the series used to measure fiscal decentralization, i.e.…”

Institution, Internationalization and Innovation: Three Papers on Penetration of Emerging-Market Multinational Enterprises into Developed Markets

“…First, the national strategy of market liberalization, a formal rule, initially favoured selective coastal regions such as Shenzhen, Zhuhai, Xiamen, Shantou, and Hainan by setting up special economic zones (SEZs) in these regions to promote export processing (Fujita and Hu, 2001;Sauvant, Zhao, and Huo, 2012). Second, governments at different sub-national levels have considerable authority to formulate their own follow-up formal rules, such as reform policies in the areas of fiscal systems (Jin and Zou, 2005), education, health, agriculture, and social welfare (Caulfield, 2006). Third, informal constraints such as customs for doing business are historically and culturally different across regions in China (Du, Lu, and Tao, 2008), which has led to different degrees of support for a legal and market system.…”